BREAKING LIVE: Supreme Court Vote to END Roe v Wade in DRAFT OPINION by Justice Samuel Alito Leaked

[Hoodat]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN a Maine education program that provides tuition assistance for students to attend some private schools but excludes schools that provide religious instruction. SCOTUS says the exclusion of religious schools is unconstitutional.

Here's the opinion from John Roberts in Carson v. Makin: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1088_dbfi.pdf. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines, with Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan in dissent.

10:32 AM · Jun 21, 2022·Twitter Web App

In a way, a replay of Everson.  Six of the Justices made the correct decision here.  The other three are pushing a political agenda with no regard to equal protection, Free Exercise, prior precedent, or the Constitution itself.  I'm surprised that Breyer and Kagan went that route.

[txradioguy]

Another week gone, and another week for the extreme left to "work on" the evil Handmaiden Justices who say Roe v Wade was wrongly decided.

They should have released the Dobbs v Jackson decision immediately after the draft ruling was leaked to the public. By not releasing it already they've allowed the left to mass their forces in DC and now run the risk of being cowered into changing their decision.

[Cyber Liberty]

They should have released the Dobbs v Jackson decision immediately after the draft ruling was leaked to the public. By not releasing it already they've allowed the left to mass their forces in DC and now run the risk of being cowered into changing their decision.

Which was CJ John Roberts' plan all along.

[txradioguy]

Which was CJ John Roberts' plan all along.

Wouldn't surprise me if it was his clerk that is the source of the leak.

[Cyber Liberty]

Wouldn't surprise me if it was his clerk that is the source of the leak.

That's certainly possible.  We always knew it had to be someone fro the far left of the SCOTUS, and Roberts fits that description as well as the other Libs.

[Right_in_Virginia]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court has added another opinion day this week. The court will issue opinions on both Thursday and Friday at 10 a.m. EDT. There are 13 cases that still remain to be decided.

10:23 AM · Jun 22, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Cyber Liberty]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court has added another opinion day this week. The court will issue opinions on both Thursday and Friday at 10 a.m. EDT. There are 13 cases that still remain to be decided.

10:23 AM · Jun 22, 2022·Twitter Web App

Will you post those on this thread?

[Hoodat]

Some key cases remaining:

Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation

Biden v. Texas

Kennedy v. Bremerton School District

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

And there are four separate petitions for West Virginia v. EPA.

[txradioguy]

SCOTUS rules in favor of Bruen.

That's 1 of 2 opinions guaranteed to make the Liberals heads explode.

I'm waiting for the second shoe to drop.

[Hoodat]

SCOTUS rules in favor of Bruen.

That's 1 of 2 opinions guaranteed to make the Liberals heads explode.

Supreme Court strikes down NY concealed handgun law

Ariane de Vogue  |  10:34 AM ET, Thu June 23, 2022

(CNN) - The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law enacted more than a century ago that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/politics/supreme-court-guns-second-amendment-new-york-bruen/index.html


6-3 decision, authored by Justice Thomas

WOOT!

[txradioguy]

Supreme Court strikes down NY concealed handgun law

Ariane de Vogue  |  10:34 AM ET, Thu June 23, 2022

(CNN) - The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York gun law enacted more than a century ago that places restrictions on carrying a concealed handgun outside the home.

This story is breaking and will be updated.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/23/politics/supreme-court-guns-second-amendment-new-york-bruen/index.html


6-3 decision, authored by Justice Thomas

WOOT!

They said that not only does it violate the 2nd but the 14th Amendment as well. The ruling will end up affecting 4 other states and DC.

[Hoodat]

Here's the decision:  https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

btw, today is Justice Thomas' 75th birthday.

[rustynail]

DU is verklempt.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142933599

[Hoodat]

DU is verklempt.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142933599

lol

[Right_in_Virginia]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court rules 8-1 that GOP lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene in litigation to defend a state voter-ID law. The NAACP is challenging the law, and the NC attorney general (a Democrat) is defending it. GOP legislators want to intervene anyway. SCOTUS says they can.

Here's the opinion from Neil Gorsuch in Berger v. North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-248_4fc5.pdf. Sonia Sotomayor dissents.

10:01 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Right_in_Virginia]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court sides with a man on Georgia's death row in a case about what procedural mechanism prisoners must use to challenge the constitutionality of a state's execution method. SCOTUS says prisoners are not limited to the federal habeas laws to bring such challenges.

Here's the opinion from Elena Kagan in Nance v. Ward: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-439_bp7c.pdf. Barrett dissents, joined Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch.

10:13 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Hoodat]

The New York statute violated Equal Protection (something Democrats have opposed since 1836).  The statute allowed firearm possession outside the house provided that the petitioner had a good enough reason.  In other words, the right to possess a firearm became subjective, with the State being the arbiter of who was allowed to exercise that right.

Due Process was also violated since the subjective decision of the State could prohibit the exercise of a citizen even though all the rules were followed.

[Right_in_Virginia]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

If a police officer fails to give a suspect his Miranda warnings, and the gov't uses the suspect's un-Mirandized statements against him in court, can the suspect sue the officer for violating his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination? In a 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS says no.

Here's the opinion from Samuel Alito in Vega v. Tekoh: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-499_gfbh.pdf. The three liberal justices dissent.

10:22 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

[txradioguy]

DU is verklempt.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142933599

time to troll them a little on twitter 

[Right_in_Virginia]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court STRIKES DOWN a New York gun-control law that required people to show "proper cause" to get a license to carry a concealed handgun outside the home. The vote is 6-3. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-843_7j80.pdf

10:32 AM · Jun 23, 2022  Twitter Web App

[Right_in_Virginia]

Jack Posobiec
@JacPosobiec

SUPREME COURT: "Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms"

🔥🔥🔥

11:14 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Hoodat]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

The Supreme Court sides with a man on Georgia's death row in a case about what procedural mechanism prisoners must use to challenge the constitutionality of a state's execution method. SCOTUS says prisoners are not limited to the federal habeas laws to bring such challenges.

Here's the opinion from Elena Kagan in Nance v. Ward: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-439_bp7c.pdf. Barrett dissents, joined Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch.

10:13 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

Roberts and Kavanaugh sided with the liberals.  Their ruling essentially says that Congress can implement laws that dictate legal petitions against States, which is a further expansion of Federalism.

On a personal note, I strongly sympathize with Nance, and I hope his petition is finally granted.  The Court should have simply ruled on his execution petition itself instead of expanding the vehicle for its legality.

[Hoodat]

SCOTUSblog
@SCOTUSblog

If a police officer fails to give a suspect his Miranda warnings, and the gov't uses the suspect's un-Mirandized statements against him in court, can the suspect sue the officer for violating his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination? In a 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS says no.

Here's the opinion from Samuel Alito in Vega v. Tekoh: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-499_gfbh.pdf. The three liberal justices dissent.

10:22 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

This should have been 9-0.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Jack Posobied
@JackPosobiec

If you are celebrating today's massive 2nd Amendment victory at the Supreme Court there are 4 little words you need to say:

THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP

11:16 AM · Jun 23, 2022·Twitter Web App

[Hoodat]

Gorsuch and Barret?  Yes.  Kavanaugh?  Not so much.