Author Topic: Supreme Court Could Hand Biden an Immigration Win  (Read 398 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online libertybele

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58,277
  • Gender: Female
  • WE are NOT ok!
Supreme Court Could Hand Biden an Immigration Win
« on: April 27, 2022, 02:02:40 am »
 9999hair out0000

Supreme Court Could Hand Biden an Immigration Win

The Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled that it could approve President Joe Biden’s plan to rescind the Trump-era "Remain in Mexico" policy for asylum seekers.

A majority of justices during oral arguments suggested they would sign off on the Department of Homeland Security's plan to terminate the program, which a federal judge stayed last August. Ending the program would allow asylum seekers to wait in the United States while the courts processed their claims. Red state challengers claim ending Remain in Mexico would violate federal law. But Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett suggested an immigration rule that allows the release of asylum seekers for humanitarian reasons on a case-by-case basis could save the administration’s plans.

The courts have allowed President Joe Biden to finesse both sides of the immigration crisis at the southern border. Rescinding Remain in Mexico, known formally as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), placated leftwing activists who said it was cruel to force asylum seekers to wait in refugee camps before their court dates. But court orders dating to summer 2021 required immigration officials to maintain MPP, if only half-heartedly.

Federal law requires the government to detain asylum seekers or return them to bordering countries pending a hearing. The Trump administration cited that law as the legal basis for Remain in Mexico. Lawyers for Texas say the Biden administration will violate that law if it succeeds in ending Remain in Mexico.
Solicitor general Elizabeth Prelogar says the government doesn’t have the detention capacity to hold every asylum seeker. Prelogar claimed Homeland Security can house about 32,000 migrants at a time when more than 220,000 are crossing the border per month.

Chief Justice John Roberts said that challenge doesn’t overcome the law.

"If you're stuck because there's no way you can comply with the law and deal with the problem there, I guess I'm just wondering why that's our problem," Roberts told Prelogar. "Our problem is to say what the law is."...................

https://www.conservativereview.com/supreme-court-could-hand-biden-an-immigration-win-2657219544.html
I Believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes.  I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey its laws to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies.

Offline Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 37,344
Re: Supreme Court Could Hand Biden an Immigration Win
« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2022, 04:36:01 am »
Quote
"If you're stuck because there's no way you can comply with the law and deal with the problem there, I guess I'm just wondering why that's our problem," Roberts told Prelogar. "Our problem is to say what the law is."...................

Let me give you a refresher there, Justice Roberts.

US Constitution

Article IV, Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion


If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.     -Dwight Eisenhower-

"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."     -Ayn Rand-