Joe wrote:
"While microprocessors might be still available in limited numbers and at much higher prices, even a modern upscale automobile will have up to 100 microprocessor regulated subsystems in it governing fuel mixture and engine timing, instrument display, monitoring tire pressure, GPS and navigation, exterior imaging, antilock braking, traction control, cabin temperature, lane position, proximity alerts, automatic parking, suspension stiffness, and gear shifting, some with multiple modes.
We'd be back to basic vehicles with absolutely no whistles and bells in no time."
OK, let's say there were no more microprocessors (or at least wouldn't be a sufficient supply of them for a good number of years)...
Why not go back to building cars, trucks, trains and airplanes WITHOUT them?
Such as, 1957 Chevys again?
This is intended to be a serious question.
The world ran in the 1950's without chips.
It could do so again, at least for a few decades, if need be.
I agree, but the transition will be rough.
On the consumer end...
How many drivers can read a dash full of gauges and interpret them to keep from destroying their vehicle?
How many can drive a manual transmission? (Yes, automatics have been around since the '50s, and those would still work, but there is a reason manual transmissions were standard).
How many will be able to drive on bad roads without traction control, shift-on-the-fly 4 wheel drive, all wheel drive, anti-lock brakes?
Vehicles start and run better in cold weather with fuel injection, how many will learn to use a choke?
Yes, we can do all that. I would think the basic plans would be somewhere, but what robot is going to build them?
What pattern makers and mold makers are going to tool up for it when the CDC goes down?
So much of manufacturing is automated (computerized) now, I wonder how many people (who have NOT been taught from their youth to work with their hands) will be able to man the assembly lines. How many are even proficient enough at math to read a micrometer?
And, even if all that can be accomplished (and I believe it could be), in time,
Will the adherents to the religion of Climate Change allow it?Those computer systems aren't just for convenience, many of them are to increase engine efficiency to reduce emissions (with the side effect of increasing engine life).
An amazing amount of stuff holding that engine back, horsepower-wise, was there to keep emissions down.