I didn't know it had a 100% reverse match to the Sars-CoV-2 virus, but had seen sources which claimed orders for test kits for the virus from 2017.
What really tripped a flag with me was Fauci saying "This Administration will face a surprise pandemic. " when Trump was POTUS, and about a year before the virus escaped/was released.
Sure, pandemics happen, but for the Director of NIAID to pin down the worldwide emergence of a novel and contagious pathogen to a three year span seemed highly suspect for me. Had he said words to the effect of 'in the future' it would have made perfect scientific sense, as in it being a question of when, not if such a pathogen would emerge, but that was not what he said (smirk included, no extra charge).
When it was evident that Impeachment wasn't going to work, and Trump had no reason to be Nixoned out, COVID popped up, with all the draconian recommendations that were economy (and people) killers, and any therapeutic that showed an inkling of promise was summarily trashed and not scientifically investigated. Certain parties had significant investments in companies which would be involved in the rollout and distribution of the mRNA injections, including Trudeau (whose family foundation has a 40% interest in the company that tailors the lipids for the capsules that contain the mRNA in the shots). I believe those fiscal ties to the companies, including grant streams and research funding, should be more thoroughly investigated, just on the hypothesis that there exists a relationship there between policy setters and the companies producing and profiting from mandates and misinformation.