New York Times reporter deflects from Durham probe developments by refueling Russia collusion narrative
Mike McIntire kept focus on the Trump campaign's ties to Russia instead of the new findings of the Clinton campaign
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News
A journalist from The New York Times attempted to change the subject away from the major developments from the ongoing Durham probe.
A court filing made late Friday by Special Counsel John Durham, who was appointed during the Trump administration to investigate the origins of the Russia probe, revealed that a tech firm coordinated with the Clinton campaign to mine internet data from Trump Tower during the 2016 election and later the White House in order to "establish 'an inference' and 'narrative' tying then-candidate Trump to Russia" and that "In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain 'VIPs,' referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign."
The revelation went viral on Saturday, causing "Durham" to trend on Twitter, but Times investigative reporter Mike McIntire expressed no interest in the special counsel's findings.
"'Durham’ is trending, so here’s a periodic reminder that Trump’s campaign chairman secretly met and shared info with a Russian intelligence agent, presenting what a GOP-led Senate committee called ‘a grave counterintelligence threat,’" McIntire wrote, sharing an excerpt from the Senate Intel Committee report alleging Paul Manafort fed information to Russian intel officer Konstantin Kilimnik in 2016.
more
https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-mike-mcintire-durham-probe
