February 14, 2022
A more optimistic take on the Durham bombshell
By Andrea Widburg
Yesterday, I wrote a post detailing what was in Special Prosecutor John Durham’s latest filing, a seemingly innocuous motion that contained within it the allegation that Rodney Joffe, a tech executive, at the behest of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, spied on Trump, both in Trump Tower and his apartment and, later, in the White House. However, my cynicism is such that I doubted this would actually come to anything. Mark Wauck, a retired counter-intelligence special agent for the FBI is more optimistic.
You can read Wauck’s entire post here. It’s built upon responding to what I wrote. As noted, I’m cynical that this will go anywhere. I haven’t forgotten that, on July 5, 2016, James Comey gave chapter and verse about Hillary’s deliberate actions to evade national security laws regarding her emails and then ended by saying, essentially, “whatever.” Wauck, however, thinks Durham’s investigation is different.
My post, after summarizing Durham’s latest allegations, echoed what Sundance, at Conservative Treehouse said, which is that this is a cosmetic exercise that is meant to provide cover for Mueller’s investigation, which was itself a cover-up. Wauck had a few rebuttals that are worth considering, especially because they’ll make you feel happier than what I wrote.
Wauck points out that it’s meaningful that Joffe is discussed but not indicted:
It’s because Durham is targeting him for cooperation. There’s only one reason a member of a conspiracy is targeted for cooperation, and that’s because that person was acting at the behest of someone higher up the ladder who exercised overall control of the conspiracy.
more
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/02/a_more_optimistic_take_on_the_durham_bombshell.html
