Malone Heralds Release of DOD Data on Excess Injuries, Deaths

[Elderberry]

The Post & Email 2/4/2022

In a Substack post Thursday night, Dr. Robert W. Malone, MD, mRNA platform inventor and one who has taken a strong position against COVID-19 vaccine mandates and censorship, wrote, “Later today or tomorrow will be the big release of the validated data discussed at the Senator Ron Johnson hearings last week.”

Malone was referencing a January 24 roundtable chaired by Johnson (R-WI) during which physicians, scientists, registered nurses, vaccine-injured individuals and an attorney contended that the government’s response to the declared COVID-19 pandemic has been misguided and harmful.

Some of the physicians who spoke described situations in which doctors advocating for early outpatient treatment of the virus are hunted down by state authorities and threatened with loss of their medical licenses.

The attorney who spoke, Thomas Renz, represents three military physicians, all of whom he identified and said provided DOD data showing that in 2021, adverse events such as chest pain, myocarditis, miscarriage and cancer incidence rose exponentially as compared to the five-year period 2016-2020.

The vaccine products, which the Biden regime mandated for the military last fall, received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approvals beginning on December 11, 2020 through early 2021, with the rollout initially prioritizing nursing-home patients, public health employees, and then the general elderly population.

Later, as the injections became more widely available, all adults were encouraged to receive them, ostensibly to prevent contraction and transmission of the coronavirus to end the pandemic. FDA “approval” of the vaccines has now encompassed Americans as young as five years old and contemplates consideration of shots for toddlers.

According to Johns Hopkins University & Medicine, “A typical vaccine development timeline takes 5 to 10 years, and sometimes longer, to assess whether the vaccine is safe and efficacious in clinical trials, complete the regulatory approval processes, and manufacture sufficient quantity of vaccine doses for widespread distribution.”

More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2022/02/04/malone-heralds-release-of-dod-data-on-excess-injuries-deaths/

[Elderberry]

The US Public Health Response has been a Colossal Failure

Robert W Malone MD, MS 2/3/2022

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/the-us-public-health-response-has?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyMTA3OTU3NywicG9zdF9pZCI6NDgwOTg4ODYsIl8iOiJldjd4byIsImlhdCI6MTY0Mzk3NTM5MywiZXhwIjoxNjQzOTc4OTkzLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNTgzMjAwIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.g1Op4or8G42GSAnayGEh9pfD6wQjJXyhaOYUyxefRdI

The US Deaths keep piling up...



Drip, drip, drip…

More evidence of our government’s completely failed response to this pandemic.

A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality

    Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis are designed to determine whether there is empirical evidence to support the belief that “lockdowns” reduce COVID-19 mortality. Lockdowns are defined as the imposition of at least one compulsory, non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI). NPIs are any government mandate that directly restrict peoples’ possibilities, such as policies that limit internal movement, close schools and businesses, and ban international travel. This study employed a systematic search and screening procedure in which 18,590 studies are identified that could potentially address the belief posed. After three levels of screening, 34 studies ultimately qualified. Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. They were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-placeorder (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality. More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average. SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality.

    While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument

It goes on:

    “They have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, and undermining liberal democracy”

    “Such a standard benefit-cost calculation leads to a strong conclusion: lockdowns should be rejected out of hand as a pandemic policy instrument”

Our Hospital systems are failing in the US. THEY ARE FAILING. Our physicians are threatened and persecuted if they use life saving treatments. Hospitalists are determined to continue to push and insist on treatments that have been proven to not be safe or effective in our hospitals. Hospitals in the USA are fraudulently bilking the US Government for literally billions of dollars, by claiming excess disease and death. So much so, that it has become impossible to figure out the true rates of disease and death of Covid-19 and for all causes in the USA. It is shocking.

The rest of the world is running circles around us. Our public policy response and our hospitalists are an embarrassment. Where are our public officials?

But to speak of these issues openly, if you are a practicing physician, is grounds for loss of a license to practice medicine, losing hospital privileges and/or getting fired. To speak out means getting publicly branded as a heretic or worse, crazy.

To actually cite reasons why this may be happening, such as the vaccines aren’t working, physicians right to treat and try has been removed, hospitals are literally killing people with their rigid and failed policies and treatments is death of one’s career. It you speak of the fraud happening at the very hospital you may be working at, it is grounds for dismissal.

More at link.