Ivermectin 62% Effective in Preventing Covid Mortality, 86% Effective in Preventing Infection, UK Do

[Elderberry]

Based Underground  by David Charbonneau, Ph.D. January 19, 2022

Ivermectin 62% Effective in Preventing Covid Mortality, 86% Effective in Preventing Infection, UK Doctor Says

Dr. Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, Ph.D., in an interview Monday with America’s Frontline Doctors discussed her research on COVID treatments, including ivermectin. Lawrie, a physician, research analyst and consultant to the World Health Organization, urged listeners to take charge of their own health.

Lawrie reviewed the results of her co-authored meta-analysis of 24 controlled trials of ivermectin, published in the American Journal of Therapeutics. She said the results showed ivermectin was 62% effective in preventing COVID mortality and 86% effective in preventing infection when taken preventatively.

Lawrie said the original, professionally published article was ignored by the mainstream press, but this “debunking” by a non-scientist received extensive coverage.

“You don’t need experimental vaccines if you have safe and effective treatments,” she said, advocating instead for more research to repurpose “old medicines” for “new diseases.”

Lawrie also urged people to “stop outsourcing your healthcare to the government,” citing several things everyone could do to protect themselves against COVID, including decreasing the use of sugar and alcohol, getting plenty of vitamin C, vitamin D and zinc and using ivermectin.

Watch the interview here:

More: https://basedunderground.com/2022/01/19/ivermectin-62-effective-in-preventing-covid-mortality-86-effective-in-preventing-infection-uk-doctor-says/?utm_source=wnd&utm_medium=wnd&utm_campaign=syndicated

[Elderberry]

Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time meta analysis of 76 studies

https://ivmmeta.com/

Covid Analysis, Jan 21, 2022, Version 173 — added Zubair  [BBC, GMK response]

•Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 49 studies from 45 independent teams in 21 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (37 primary outcome, 34 most serious outcome).

•Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 66% [53 75%] and 83% [74 89%] improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after exclusion based sensitivity analysis (excluding all GMK/BBC team studies), for primary outcomes, for peer-reviewed studies, and for RCTs.

•Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 60 of 76 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.

•While many treatments have some level of efficacy, they do not replace vaccines and other measures to avoid infection. Only 25% of ivermectin studies show zero events in the treatment arm.

•Multiple treatments are typically used in combination, which may be significantly more effective.

•Elimination of COVID-19 is a race against viral evolution. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100% available and effective for all variants. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used, including treatments, as supported by Pfizer [Pfizer, TrialSiteNews]. Denying the efficacy of treatments increases mortality, morbidity, collateral damage, and endemic risk.

There is evidence of a negative publication bias, and the probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 76 studies is estimated to be 1 in 68 billion.

•Over 20 countries have adopted ivermectin for COVID-19. The evidence base is much larger and has much lower conflict of interest than typically used to approve drugs.

•All data to reproduce this paper and sources are in the appendix. See [Bryant, Hariyanto, Kory, Lawrie, Nardelli] for other meta analyses with similar results confirming efficacy.

Introduction

We analyze all significant studies concerning the use of ivermectin for COVID-19. Search methods, inclusion criteria, effect extraction criteria (more serious outcomes have priority), all individual study data, PRISMA answers, and statistical methods are detailed in Appendix 1. We present random effects meta-analysis results for all studies, studies within each treatment stage, specific outcomes, peer-reviewed studies, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), and after exclusions.

We also perform a simple analysis of the distribution of study effects. If treatment was not effective, the observed effects would be randomly distributed (or more likely to be negative if treatment is harmful). We can compute the probability that the observed percentage of positive results (or higher) could occur due to chance with an ineffective treatment (the probability of >= k heads in n coin tosses, or the one-sided sign test / binomial test). Analysis of publication bias is important and adjustments may be needed if there is a bias toward publishing positive results.

Figure 2 shows stages of possible treatment for COVID-19. Prophylaxis refers to regularly taking medication before becoming sick, in order to prevent or minimize infection. Early Treatment refers to treatment immediately or soon after symptoms appear, while Late Treatment refers to more delayed treatment.

[Fishrrman]

"Prophylaxis refers to regularly taking medication before becoming sick, in order to prevent or minimize infection."

So...
What is the prophylaxis required for ivermectin?
Dosage and frequency...?

[Hoodat]

Ivermectin 62% Effective in Preventing Covid Mortality, 86% Effective in Preventing Infection, UK Doctor Says

This is why FDA & NIH administrators and Federal and State officials should be put on trial for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans by denying them this simple care.  And when found guilty, they should each be hung from the neck until dead.

[Hoodat]

"Prophylaxis refers to regularly taking medication before becoming sick, in order to prevent or minimize infection."

So...
What is the prophylaxis required for ivermectin?
Dosage and frequency...?

Ask @roamer_1 .  He's been taking the stuff for months if not years now.

[Elderberry]

"Prophylaxis refers to regularly taking medication before becoming sick, in order to prevent or minimize infection."

So...
What is the prophylaxis required for ivermectin?
Dosage and frequency...?

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Alliance-I-MASKplus-Protocol-ENGLISH.pdf

I-MASK+ PREVENTION & EARLY OUTPATIENT
TREATMENT PROTOCOL FOR COVID-19

[roamer_1]

Ask @roamer_1 .  He's been taking the stuff for months if not years now.

Naw... I did a 5 day run, according to the weight measurement instructions on the horse wormer tube. I just rounded up to the nearest 50 weight and went with that. That was for when everyone was coming out here for my nephew's wedding back in August...

Since then I ain't had any. With critters you use it about 2 times a year - So it has a residual effect. I would be worried for taking it all the time or often.

[roamer_1]

PS: Make SURE you are jacking zinc with the ivermectin for good results - If you are low on zinc, it won't work as well.

And ALL y'all should be sure your D and K and C are seriously good. I jack them all winter long anyway, though I am hyper-jacking Cs - 2x 500mg with every meal, and two EmergenCs every morning.

[Hoodat]

Vitamin C is one thing you cannot OD from.  Much younger in life when I'd gotten really bad poison ivy, I would take 1000 mg every 20 min to make the itch stop.