Author Topic: New York Times Confirms Revolver’s Claim of FBI Involvement In 1/6… But What Are They Still Hiding?  (Read 302 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,567
New York Times Confirms Revolver’s Claim of FBI Involvement In 1/6… But What Are They Still Hiding?
Revolver, Sep 27, 2021, Darren J. Beattle

In mid June, Revolver News published a groundbreaking investigative report arguing that certain elements of the federal government not only had foreknowledge of the events of 1/6, but that some senior members of the major militia groups blamed for the so-called “insurrection” were actually federal informants or undercover operatives themselves.

Scarcely three months after this report, the New York Times took the occasion of a sleepy Saturday morning to quietly confirm that there were indeed FBI informants among those militia members who “stormed the Capitol.”

Quote
As scores of Proud Boys made their way, chanting and shouting, toward the Capitol on Jan. 6, one member of the far-right group was busy texting a real-time account of the march.

The recipient was his F.B.I. handler.

In the middle of an unfolding melee that shook a pillar of American democracy — the peaceful transfer of power — the bureau had an informant in the crowd, providing an inside glimpse of the action, according to confidential records obtained by The New York Times. [NYT]

We learn that this particular informant, affiliated with a Midwest chapter of the Proud Boys militia group, provided the FBI advance warning that he would be traveling to DC along with other Proud Boys. The informant also kept his FBI handler in the loop as the “storming of the Capitol” unfolded throughout the day on the 6th.The piece goes on to reference an “additional informant from another Proud Boys chapter that took part in the sacking of the Capitol.”

The confirmed existence of at least two (and likely many more) FBI informants who went into the Capitol strengthens the case for federal foreknowledge to such an extent that even the New York Times was compelled to acknowledge the following:

Quote
But the records, and information from two people familiar with the matter, suggest that federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into the assault on the Capitol, even as it was taking place, than was previously known.

More: 
https://www.revolver.news/2021/09/new-york-times-confirms-fbi-involvement-jan-6/


Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,567
Full NYT article:

Among Those Who Marched Into the Capitol on Jan. 6: An F.B.I. Informant
A member of the far-right Proud Boys texted his F.B.I. handler during the assault, but maintained the group had no plan in advance to enter the Capitol and disrupt the election certification.
NYT, Sep 25, 2021

https://archive.fo/u8TG4



Offline Right_in_Virginia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 80,567
Sep 28, 2021


https://mobile.twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1443024113778495491

"The basis of high level investigations"  ----- including the impeachment of a private citizen.