Psaki is downright condescending in her response. While ignoring the actual question, she derides candidates for this treatment as people already infected and criticizes their situation as one that is avoidable through vaccination. And she does this even though half those in South Florida seeking this treatment are already "fully vaccinated".
Her reply of being "equitable" in distribution completely ignores the epidemiological fact that disease outbreaks tend to be geographically concentrated.
Having a set distribution per square mile or 10,000 population just guarantees that the treatment will NOT be in the geographic 'hotspots' where it is needed most (i.e., we don't send Ebola treatments to the Seychelles to be "equitable", but send them to the area of an outbreak.)
Folks, at best this is policy manslaughter, at worst, this is murder.