High School Requires that 11th Grade Boy Undress with Girls to Promote Tolerance

[rangerrebew]

High School Requires that 11th Grade Boy Undress with Girls to Promote Tolerance
Joe Mullins Joe Mullins September 17, 2021   

The left gets more insane by the day. A Pennsylvania high school requires that an 11th grade boy undresses with girls to promote tolerance. Yes, you read that right.

Here is more, per Breitbart:

A teenage boy and his parents have filed a lawsuit against a Pennsylvania high school saying that administrators tried to shame the boy for being “intolerant” and demanded that he undress with girls in the school locker room to “make it seem natural.”

The lawsuit, filed by Alliance Defending Freedom and Independence Law Center (ILC), is alleging that the Boyertown Area School District in Boyertown, Pennsylvania, sexually harassed the plaintiff, CBS News reported.

https://civildeadline.com/high-school-requires-that-11th-grade-boy-undress-with-girls-to-promote-tolerance/

[240B]

Headlines like these were considered the baseline of a pornography movie only a few years ago.
How about making 11th grade girls undress in the boy's locker room? You know ... of course ... to promote tolerance.
AND ... since all the students involved would be from 16 to 17 years old, this is a clear indisputable case of forced underage sexual behavior.
The administrators involved NEED to be labeled as sexual predators, regardless of the 'intent'.

[DB]

If you really want to get pissed off read this:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/video-sucked-eachothers-ds-mother-reads-sexually-explicit-school-book-board-members/

[sneakypete]

I don't believe it. NOBODY is THAT freaking stoopid.

Not even Dims.

[sneakypete]

Headlines like these were considered the baseline of a pornography movie only a few years ago.
How about making 11th grade girls undress in the boy's locker room? You know ... of course ... to promote tolerance.
AND ... since all the students involved would be from 16 to 17 years old, this is a clear indisputable case of forced underage sexual behavior.
The administrators involved NEED to be labeled as sexual predators, regardless of the 'intent'.

@240B

Works for me!

[Smokin Joe]

@240B

Works for me!

Me, too. In more civilized times, they'd suffer a far more direct fate.

[sneakypete]

Me, too. In more civilized times, they'd suffer a far more direct fate.

@Smokin Joe

Lotta truth is those few short words.

[Wingnut]

I remember one time in Jr High Gym class during the swim period. 
Back in the day boys swam nekkid. But things ran long one day and when we went to the locker room the girls were in the room undressing.  So here you have 30 swinging dicks walking in on 30 semi nekkid girls.   It was not pretty.  But I remember it still to this day!

[Kamaji]

Headlines like these were considered the baseline of a pornography movie only a few years ago.
How about making 11th grade girls undress in the boy's locker room? You know ... of course ... to promote tolerance.
AND ... since all the students involved would be from 16 to 17 years old, this is a clear indisputable case of forced underage sexual behavior.
The administrators involved NEED to be labeled as sexual predators, regardless of the 'intent'.

Yup.

[sneakypete]

Headlines like these were considered the baseline of a pornography movie only a few years ago.
How about making 11th grade girls undress in the boy's locker room? You know ... of course ... to promote tolerance.
AND ... since all the students involved would be from 16 to 17 years old, this is a clear indisputable case of forced underage sexual behavior.
The administrators involved NEED to be labeled as sexual predators, regardless of the 'intent'.

[/b]

@240B


What else could their intent have possibly been?