Entire “climate change” statistical model is revealed as little more than junk science hoax

[rangerrebew]

Entire “climate change” statistical model is revealed as little more than junk science hoax

09/08/2021 / By JD Heyes

For decades the communist left in America has tried to scare us all into accepting an authoritarian lifestyle, the kind which our founders rebelled against.

During the countercultural ‘revolution’ of the 1960s, the big scare — the big lie, the hoax — was that our planet was going to die from overconsumption and “overpopulation,” so we should stop having children to ‘preserve’ our world.

Next up, it was global “cooling.” As average temperatures fell over a period of a decade or so and weather patterns changed somewhat, the unscientific left predicted a coming second “Ice Age” would snuff out all life, so we would need to make major alterations in our lifestyles in order to prevent that catastrophe.

But when temperatures began to warm again, and in some instances, unseasonably so, global cooling was changed to “global warming” but with the same dire predictions that modern life was ruining the planet and we would have to give up raising meat, fossil fuels and modernity so we could live.

https://www.climate.news/2021-09-08-entire-climate-change-statistical-model-revealed-as-junk-science-hoax.html#

[Fishrrman]

Indeed, the greatest hoax in human history.

The reason why it's being pushed so hard is that it will usher in an era of communist control over the world, willingly swallowed by the gullible in the name of "climate".

It will be too late by the time the populations of the world realize just WHAT they've gulped down in the name of "saving the planet"...

[Bigun]

Entire “climate change” statistical model is revealed as little more than junk science hoax

Never been anything else so I wonder what was revealed.

[Kamaji]

The heart of the matter:

A new study in “Climate Dynamics” has criticized a key methodology that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) uses to attribute climate change to greenhouse gases, raising questions about the validity of research that relied on it and prompting a response from one of the scientists who developed the technique.

The new study’s author, economist Ross McKitrick, told The Epoch Times in an exclusive interview that he thinks his results have weakened the IPCC’s case that greenhouse gases cause climate change.

The methodology, known as “optimal fingerprinting,” has been used to link greenhouse gases to everything from temperature to forest fires, precipitation, and snow cover.

The researcher went on to compare optimal fingerprinting to the way police officers use the technique to identify criminals.

“[They] take this big smudge of data and say, ‘Yeah, the fingerprints of greenhouse gas are on it,’” he told the outlet.

 McKitrick went on to say that the research he was criticizing, 1999’s paper in Climate Dynamics “Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting,” is a “cornerstone of the field of attribution” — that is, the primary body of research that has often been cited to allegedly identify what causes climate change (as in, human activities).
The researcher said that the authors of that decades-old paper, Myles Allen and Simon Tett, made several mistakes in the way they validated their strategy.

“When you do a statistical analysis, it’s not enough just to crunch some numbers and publish the result and say, ‘This is what the data tell us.’ You then have to apply some tests to your modeling technique to see if it’s valid for the kind of data you’re using,” he said.

In other words, a classic GIGO situation.