The defense of Babbitt by some sounds very similar to BLM activists defending a thug shot by police
Reality is we the public know little about this case to come to a conclusion
Except Babitt was a veteran who honorably served.
Floyd was a criminal thug who had 5 prior felonies, and was hopped up on a probable lethal dose of fentanyl
Babitt was shot in cold blood
The circumstance of Floyd's death are still in question IMO
Babbitt died smeared by the MSM as a terrorist in the January 6th.
Floyd?- Pretty much sainted.
Policeman?-
7 months later the shooter hasn't even been ID'ed, and has recently offically been cleared
Chauvin was roasted.
So saying the defenses are similar, might be a tad inaccurate, wouldn't you think?