Author Topic: Scientific American is an Oxymoron  (Read 99 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
Scientific American is an Oxymoron
« on: August 15, 2021, 01:49:51 pm »

Scientific American is an Oxymoron
By Joe Bastardi |August 12th, 2021

Apparently with this headline

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/lets-start-naming-climate-related-disasters-for-polluters-and-their-enablers/

They are blissfully unaware that a) wildfire acreage burnt is BELOW THE 10 YEAR AVERAGE. That 10-year average is less than 20% of what the 10 years average 1926-1935 was

Screen Shot 2021-08-11 at 10.50.11 PM.png

B) No one is talking to them about the weather, With the developing trough in the west later this month

https://www.cfact.org/2021/08/12/scientific-american-is-an-oxymoron/

Online catfish1957

  • Laken Riley.... Say her Name. And to every past and future democrat voter- Her blood is on your hands too!!!
  • Political Researcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,656
  • Gender: Male
Re: Scientific American is an Oxymoron
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2021, 01:51:37 pm »
Doesn't seem that long ago this was an enjoyable read.

The only pollution I am seeing is the quality of unbiased writing.
I display the Confederate Battle Flag in honor of my great great great grandfathers who spilled blood at Wilson's Creek and Shiloh.  5 others served in the WBTS with honor too.