0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The mainstream media has gone into a frenzy reporting on General Mark Milley's claims about a supposed "coup" in the wake of the 2020 election. One of Milley's claims was a conversation he supposedly had on the topic with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows during the Army-Navy game. So why didn't all these meeting outlets slobbering over the Milley story check with Meadows about Milley's claim? Probably because they feared that Meadows would inconveniently contradict the narrative they are trying to promote. If that was their fear they were right because Meadows did indeed call BS on Milley's wacky coup story.In addition to Meadows contradicting the coup fable, simple common sense would tell any journalist concerned with the truth that the coup fable is probably FAKE NEWS. How? Well, if Milley blabbered all that stuff now being claimed in a book about a "coup" and a "Reichstag Moment" and the "Gospel of the Fuhrer" do you honestly think that such nonsense would have leaked out by now? Remember, Milley supposedly told this stuff to MANY people and since it of such an inflammatory nature it is impossible that at least one person would not have leaked it BEFORE the book came out.As if to confirm this, I will now assign all you boys and girls out there in the media and elsewhere a homework assignment: Go to Google Search and enter the terms "Milley" and "Coup." Then custom range the search from Nov. 4, 2020 to June 15, 2021 before the book hype came out. Don't be too surprised to see the search results reveal ZERO as to Milley saying any of the wild claims in the book. In other words, we are expected to believe that of all the dozens of people Milley supposedly blabbered his inflammatory nonsense to, NONE leaked a word about it.And yet, the mainstream media is repeating the nonsense from the book without even doing basic verification of the Milley nonsense. Very very convenient.
