Tucker Carlson Goes Off, Reads Thread On Why Some Trump Supporters Do Not Believe 2020 Election

[mystery-ak]

Tucker Carlson Goes Off, Reads Thread On Why Some Trump Supporters Do Not Believe 2020 Election
July 10, 2021
Written by Carmine Sabia

Fox News host Tucker Carlson used his most recent monologue to read a massive Twitter thread by a podcaster who broke down precisely why Donald Trump supporters have doubts about the 2020 presidential election.

The Twitter thread was written by Darryl Cooper, the host of The MartyrMade Podcast, and read by Carlson on Friday.

It is a must read, or if you prefer just listen to Carlson read it, but either way it should be read and shared by everyone because it is that important.


more w/transcript

https://conservativebrief.com/tucker-carlson-election-44837/

[skeeter]

Whomever wrote that essay deserves recognition. I’ve never heard a more concise description of the  current mindset of the typical Trump supporter.

[catfish1957]

Talk about the most concise, correct capsule of truth I have heard in months.  A must listen for Briefers, and another reason we need to do our best to support Carlson as the government/NSA tries to silence him.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Whomever wrote that essay deserves recognition. I’ve never heard a more concise description of the  current mindset of the typical Trump supporter.

Agree @skeeter

Darryl Cooper's twitter feed:  https://twitter.com/martyrmade

Website w/link to podcasts: https://martyrmade.com/

Start of MartyrMade's 35 post twitter stream read by Tucker on air: 

https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1413165168956088321

[catfish1957]

Want to get the  reason many think this is was rigged?

Start reading the real time election night thread.  Starting at about Page 24.....


https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,418946.575.html

[DB]

Yep, those are indeed the facts. And it was a real eye opener on just how corrupt our government and media are. In your face corruption with no fear of legal consequences across the board.

[Right_in_Virginia]

https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1413165168956088321

Most believe some or all of the theories involving midnight ballots, voting machines, etc, but what you find when you talk to them is that, while they'll defend those positions w/info they got from Hannity or Breitbart or whatever, they're not particularly attached to them. 2/x

Here are the facts - actual, confirmed facts - that shape their perspective: 1) The FBI/etc spied on the 2016 Trump campaign using evidence manufactured by the Clinton campaign. We now know that all involved knew it was fake from Day 1 (see: Brennan's July 2016 memo, etc). 3/x

These are Tea Party people. The types who give their kids a pocket Constitution for their birthday and have Founding Fathers memes in their bios. The intel community spying on a presidential campaign using fake evidence (incl forged documents) is a big deal to them. 4/x

Everyone involved lied about their involvement as long as they could. We only learned the DNC paid for the manufactured evidence because of a court order. Comey denied on TV knowing the DNC paid for it, when we have emails from a year earlier proving that he knew. 5/x

This was true with everyone, from CIA Dir Brennan & Adam Schiff - who were on TV saying they'd seen clear evidence of collusion w/Russia, while admitting under oath behind closed doors that they hadn't - all the way down the line. In the end we learned that it was ALL fake. 6/x

At first, many Trump ppl were worried there must be some collusion, because every media & intel agency wouldn't make it up out of nothing. When it was clear that they had made it up, people expected a reckoning, and shed many illusions about their gov't when it didn't happen. 7/x

We know as fact: a) The Steele dossier was the sole evidence used to justify spying on the Trump campaign, b) The FBI knew the Steele dossier was a DNC op, c) Steele's source told the FBI the info was unserious, d) they did not inform the court of any of this and kept spying. 8/x

Trump supporters know the collusion case front and back. They went from worrying the collusion must be real, to suspecting it might be fake, to realizing it was a scam, then watched as every institution - agencies, the press, Congress, academia - gaslit them for another year. 9/x

Worse, collusion was used to scare people away from working in the administration. They knew their entire lives would be investigated. Many quit because they were being bankrupted by legal fees. The DoJ, press, & gov't destroyed lives and actively subverted an elected admin. 10/x

This is where people whose political identity was largely defined by a naive belief in what they learned in Civics class began to see the outline of a Regime that crossed all institutional boundaries. Because it had stepped out of the shadows to unite against an interloper. 11/x

GOP propaganda still has many of them thinking in terms of partisan binaries, but A LOT of Trump supporters see that the Regime is not partisan. They all know that the same institutions would have taken opposite sides if it was a Tulsi Gabbard vs Jeb Bush election. 12/x

It's hard to describe to people on the left (who are used to thinking of gov't as a conspiracy... Watergate, COINTELPRO, WMD, etc) how shocking & disillusioning this was for people who encourage their sons to enlist in the Army, and hate ppl who don't stand for the Anthem. 13/x

They could have managed the shock if it only involved the government. But the behavior of the corporate press is really what radicalized them. They hate journalists more than they hate any politician or gov't official, because they feel most betrayed by them. 14/x

The idea that the press is driven by ratings/sensationalism became untenable. If that were true, they'd be all over the Epstein story. The corporate press is the propaganda arm of the Regime they now see in outline. Nothing anyone says will ever make them unsee that, period. 15/x

This is profoundly disorienting. Many of them don't know for certain whether ballots were faked in November 2020, but they know for absolute certain that the press, the FBI, etc would lie to them if there was. They have every reason to believe that, and it's probably true. 16/x

They watched the press behave like animals for four years. Tens of millions of people will always see Kavanaugh as a gang rapist, based on nothing, because of CNN. And CNN seems proud of that. They led a lynch mob against a high school kid. They cheered on a summer of riots. 17/x

They always claimed the media had liberal bias, fine, whatever. They still thought the press would admit truth if they were cornered. Now they don't. It's a different thing to watch them invent stories whole cloth in order to destroy regular lives and spark mass violence. 18/x

Time Mag told us that during the 2020 riots, there were weekly conference calls involving, among others, leaders of the protests, the local officials who refused to stop them, and media people who framed them for political effect. In Ukraine we call that a color revolution. 19/x

Throughout the summer, Democrat governors took advantage of COVID to change voting procedures. It wasn't just the mail-ins (they lowered signature matching standards, etc). After the collusion scam, the fake impeachment, Trump ppl expected shenanigans by now. 20/x

Re: "fake impeachment", we now know that Trump's request for Ukraine to cooperate w/the DOJ regarding Biden's $ activities in Ukraine was in support of an active investigation being pursued by the FBI and Ukraine AG at the time, and so a completely legitimate request. 21/x

Then you get the Hunter laptop scandal. Big Tech ran a full-on censorship campaign against a major newspaper to protect a political candidate. Period. Everyone knows it, all of the Tech companies now admit it was a "mistake" - but, ya know, the election's over, so who cares? 22/x

Goes w/o saying, but: If the NY Times had Don Jr's laptop, full of pics of him smoking crack and engaging in group sex, lots of lurid family drama, emails describing direct corruption and backed up by the CEO of the company they were using, the NYT wouldn't have been banned. 23/x

Think back: Stories about Trump being pissed on by Russian prostitutes and blackmailed by Putin were promoted as fact, and the only evidence was a document paid for by his opposition and disavowed by its source. The NY Post was banned for reporting on true information. 24/x

The reaction of Trump ppl to all this was not, "no fair!" That's how they felt about Romney's "binders of women" in 2012. This is different. Now they see, correctly, that every institution is captured by ppl who will use any means to exclude them from the political process. 25/x

And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew. 26/x

Over the ensuing weeks, they got shuffled around by grifters and media scam artists selling them conspiracy theories. They latched onto one, then another increasingly absurd theory as they tried to put a concrete name on something very real. 27/x

Media & Tech did everything to make things worse. Everything about the election was strange - the changes to procedure, unprecedented mail-in voting, the delays, etc - but rather than admit that and make everything transparent, they banned discussion of it (even in DMs!). 28/x

Everyone knows that, just as Don Jr's laptop would've been the story of the century, if everything about the election dispute was the same, except the parties were reversed, suspicions about the outcome would've been Taken Very Seriously. See 2016 for proof. 29/x

Even the courts' refusal of the case gets nowhere w/them, because of how the opposition embraced mass political violence. They'll say, w/good reason: What judge will stick his neck out for Trump knowing he'll be destroyed in the media as a violent mob burns down his house? 30/x

It's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were "protests", but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have families, too. 31/x

Forget the ballot conspiracies. It's a fact that governors used COVID to unconstitutionally alter election procedures (the Constitution states that only legislatures can do so) to help Biden to make up for a massive enthusiasm gap by gaming the mail-in ballot system. 32/x

They knew it was unconstitutional, it's right there in plain English. But they knew the cases wouldn't see court until after the election. And what judge will toss millions of ballots because a governor broke the rules? The threat of mass riots wasn't implied, it was direct. 33/x

The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump from Day 1, b) The press is part of the operation, c) Election rules were changed, d) Big Tech censors opposition, e) Political violence is legitimized & encouraged, f) Trump is banned from social media. 34/x

They were led down some rabbit holes, but they are absolutely right that their gov't is monopolized by a Regime that believes they are beneath representation, and will observe no limits to keep them getting it. Trump fans should be happy he lost; it might've kept him alive. /end

[Right_in_Virginia]

It's a fact, according to Time Magazine, that mass riots were planned in cities across the country if Trump won. Sure, they were "protests", but they were planned by the same people as during the summer, and everyone knows what it would have meant. Judges have families, too. 31/x

The entrenched bureaucracy & security state subverted Trump from Day 1, b) The press is part of the operation, c) Election rules were changed, d) Big Tech censors opposition, e) Political violence is legitimized & encouraged, f) Trump is banned from social media. 34/x

https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1413688907766579202

[skeeter]

Talk about the most concise, correct capsule of truth I have heard in months.  A must listen for Briefers, and another reason we need to do our best to support Carlson as the government/NSA tries to silence him.

A must listen for Briefers who love to repeat the counterintuitive claim Trump lost ‘fairly, squarely and bigly’

@Right_in_Virginia thanks for the links!

[Right_in_Virginia]

Want to get the  reason many think this is was rigged?

Start reading the real time election night thread.  Starting at about Page 24.....


https://www.gopbriefingroom.com/index.php/topic,418946.575.html

Darryl Cooper captures the pivitol moment perfectly @catfish1957 :

And yet they showed up in record numbers to vote. He got 13m more votes than in 2016, 10m more than Clinton got! As election night dragged on, they allowed themselves some hope. But when the four critical swing states (and only those states) went dark at midnight, they knew. 26/x

[Hoodat]

Tucker should invite Neil Cavuto onto his show to get his perspective.

[goatprairie]

Oh yeah, Trumpsters, good old Tucker is on your side, right? Let's ask Tucker:

Hey, Tucker, the election was stolen, yes or no?
What's that?....I can't hear you. You don't want to answer the question?
 Of course you don't. Because you know the election wasn't stolen, but you don't want to lose 80% of your audience.
 So you make it look like you're with the MAGAs by giving Trumpsters a lot of misdirection and gobbledygook. But you for sure believe Trump lost fairly, squarely, and bigly. Good job riding the fence Tucker.

[DB]

Oh yeah, Trumpsters, good old Tucker is on your side, right? Let's ask Tucker:

Hey, Tucker, the election was stolen, yes or no?
What's that?....I can't hear you. You don't want to answer the question?
 Of course you don't. Because you know the election wasn't stolen, but you don't want to lose 80% of your audience.
 So you make it look like you're with the MAGAs by giving Trumpsters a lot of misdirection and gobbledygook. But you for sure believe Trump lost fairly, squarely, and bigly. Good job riding the fence Tucker.

LOL... Complete disconnect from reality.

[Cyber Liberty]

Oh yeah, Trumpsters, good old Tucker is on your side, right? Let's ask Tucker:

Hey, Tucker, the election was stolen, yes or no?
What's that?....I can't hear you. You don't want to answer the question?
 Of course you don't. Because you know the election wasn't stolen, but you don't want to lose 80% of your audience.
 So you make it look like you're with the MAGAs by giving Trumpsters a lot of misdirection and gobbledygook. But you for sure believe Trump lost fairly, squarely, and bigly. Good job riding the fence Tucker.

We need to put your adventures in eating crow on Pay Per View.  TBR would never have to have another fundraiser. 

[Wingnut]

Oh yeah, Trumpsters, good old Tucker is on your side, right? Let's ask Tucker:

Hey, Tucker, the election was stolen, yes or no?
What's that?....I can't hear you. You don't want to answer the question?
 Of course you don't. Because you know the election wasn't stolen, but you don't want to lose 80% of your audience.
 So you make it look like you're with the MAGAs by giving Trumpsters a lot of misdirection and gobbledygook. But you for sure believe Trump lost fairly, squarely, and bigly. Good job riding the fence Tucker.

Your dumbass is showing...again

[Fishrrman]

Wingnut gripes:
"Your dumbass is showing...again"

I put him on ignore a while back.
Not coming off, ever.
Why put up with nincompoops...?

[Right_in_Virginia]

Author of the Mega-Viral Thread on MAGA Voters, Darryl Cooper, Explains His Thinking
OutsideVoices.Substack, Jul 12, 2021, Darryl Cooper

I quit Twitter last August. Quit for good. Other than posting links to two new episodes of my podcast, I stayed away for eight months and didn’t regret a thing. Around mid-June I let myself  be persuaded that social media engagement was part of having a podcast, so I dipped back in, promising myself I’d avoid being pulled into politics. Things haven’t gone as planned.

The temptation was disguised cleverly as a conversation with a friend’s mother. She was visiting from upstate New York and we got to talking while my buddy was in the house tending to my goddaughter. She’s a hardcore Trumper from a less cynical generation that believes what she hears from sources she trusts. She’d been hounding her son about the stolen election all week, and he’d been trying to disabuse her of various theories involving trucked-in ballots and hacked counting machines. Now she had me cornered and put the question to me: “Do YOU think the election was legit?” So I told her the truth: I don’t know.

By the time my friend had put the baby to bed and rejoined us, we were waist-deep in a discussion about what happened last year, and she was satisfied that I was on her side. “See?!? He (she meant me) knows what’s going on! I’m not crazy. He’s smart, and HE knows!” My friend pulled the Captain Picard facepalm, and said, “Darryl, what the f*ck are you telling her?”

What I told her was some version of the Twitter thread Tucker Carlson read on  air Friday night and which President Trump, using my name, then explicitly promoted in his speech to CPAC on Sunday, which has blown my inbox, and my promise to stay away from politics, to smithereens.

I told her I didn’t know much about the ballots, or the voting machines, or some company that she’d heard had ties to Venezuela. I didn’t follow Sidney Powell, or Lin Wood, or the details of the cases proceeding through the system. I think it was around the time Rudy Giuliani chose a landscape and gardening emporium as the location for a press conference on what would have been the greatest political scandal in American history that I made the conscious decision to stop paying attention. Or maybe it was the dripping hair dye, or something about a kraken — it’s all sort of blended together these days.

But I felt for her. She wasn’t the first person with whom I’d had the discussion, and I felt for all of them. I’ve had the discussion often enough that I feel comfortable extracting a general theory about where these people are coming from.



Read more:  https://outsidevoices.substack.com/p/author-of-the-mega-viral-thread-on

[Cyber Liberty]

Yes, of course.  Somebody got to him. 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Yes, of course.  Somebody got to him.

@Cyber Liberty   Cooper's essay is long and hammers the same points he outlined in his long twitter thread. He continues to give a level of objective credibility to the theft of the election.

[Cyber Liberty]

@Cyber Liberty   Cooper's essay is long and hammers the same points he outlined in his long twitter thread. He continues to give a level of objective credibility to the theft of the election.

I felt a pull back on the reins  when I read this compared to earlier. but he's doing fine so far otherwise.  That original Twitter thread is the stuff of legends. 

[skeeter]

Your dumbass is showing...again

it wouldn’t be so bad if it weren't such a butt-ugly dumbass.