In other words, he was giving treatments to people who weren't even sick. No wonder he got such good results! It's easy to have high rates of success when your patients never had the virus to begin with.
. Oh, knock it off with the melodrama. If you want to leave, then hit that logout button up top. You are likely one of the only people here who actually believes your nonsense.
Not a single scientific study has verified any of this.
In other words, every scientific study that shows contradiction of your beliefs MUST have done something wrong. But you'll ignore the flaws of any study in your favor. 
Grossly outnumbered by the ones that don't show a benefit, by the way.
This is a profound example of scientific ignorance. In any scientific study, there MUST be a control group to which you compare results. That's how you account for a placebo effect.
That's because, as I said before, the patients NEVER HAD THE VIRUS TO BEGIN WITH!
We've already established that $20 worth of pills aren't going to do squat for an airborne virus.
I posted links to scientific journals in a previous post. I'm not leaving, just because someone needs to point out the part of this you obviously are not getting. As for Corsi, I don't follow his stuff, like I said. I don't 'do' Art Bell, and even rarely listen to Alex Jones.
But I have been researching SARS-CoV-2, the proposed remedies, the supposed facebook quality "debunking" of HCQ/Zithromax/Zinc and the alleged studies (all of which lacked the Zinc supplementation, many of which did not administer the macrolide antibiotic, and yet claimed the regimen to be a "failure", and most of which administered what they did to patients who were well advanced in their disease) to back it. Zelenko proposed a regimen to be used
before the virus had spread in the lungs, and may have treated a few people who only had a cold (It turns out zinc is effective in reducing the symptoms and duration of colds, too). At the time Zelenko suggested the protocol, the lag time for tests to determine if the virus was present was as long as two weeks. When he brought up his results, many of his patients had positive test results from tests taken before they started the regimen, the results of the tests were slow in coming. For the others who did not test positive, there is evidence that the regimen confers a prophylactic effect (not immunity, but resistance). Waiting two weeks to treat someone is a guarantee that either the disease will have run its course (mild case) or the patient will likely be hospitalized, in ICU, or the morgue.
I must note that Hydroxychloroquine came under attack, even though it has been in use for decades as an antimalarial, a treatment for Lupus and Rheumatoid arthritis, on the same day Trump mentioned it. Suddenly it was called 'deadly', 'dangerous' and the side effects were blown all out of proportion (often conflated with Chloroquine, a different drug, and one which has more harsh side effects--which is the reason hydroxychloroquine was created, almost as much as the adverse reactions to the vaccine have been muted. And the information from numerous doctors has been squelched in the media, mainstream and social, as welcome as an article which states global warming isn't caused by humans is in a Climatology Journal.
Censorship on this issue is real, ongoing, and covering up a crime against humanity.
Similarly, Ivermectin/Doxycycline/Zinc have proved effective as well. I know people who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and taken that regimen, even though they had to resort to veterinary Ivermectin. Within 4 days they were symptom free, even though they were feeling pretty rough when they started.
You are going to believe what you are going to believe.
I can't convince you. Follow the Facebook fackcheckers if you wish. For now, it's still a nominally free country.
But then, I have to ask, if the vaccine is so effective, why are people still wearing masks? If they are vaccinated, then no one infected should be any threat to their well-being at all.
