Author Topic: Defense, State Agree: Diversity, Inclusion Important for Mission Success  (Read 217 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
 Defense, State Agree: Diversity, Inclusion Important for Mission Success
June 16, 2021 | BY C. Todd Lopez , DOD News

Diversity and inclusion are as important to the State Department's ability to conduct diplomacy as they are to the Defense Department's ability to defend the nation.

At a town hall meeting at the Pentagon for the department's industrial policy community, Stacy A. Cummings, who is performing the duties of undersecretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment, met with Ambassador Gina Abercrombie-Winstanley, the chief diversity and inclusion officer at the State Department, to discuss the importance of diversity and inclusion in the success of their respective agencies.

An aerial view of the Pentagon.

"The [secretary of defense] looks at the department, leading through values. And diversity, equity, and inclusion are part of our values as a country and our values as a department,” Cummings said. "His intention is that we incorporate that into our work and everything that we do. It is a strategic imperative, and it's critical to mission success and accomplishment that diversity and inclusion are included in our strategies."

https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2660183/defense-state-agree-diversity-inclusion-important-for-mission-success/

rangerrebew

  • Guest
The State Department is already a cooked goose, then.  Just how many conservatives has the Biden Administration brought in to help with success?  You say adding white people isn't diversity.  Well, then, how many black conservatives has it added?  When democrats say diversity, they mean only skin color, something MLK would have railed against; skin color being the only way to judge a person.  Democrats have absolutely no interest in diversity of thought.  Even a democrat who believes abortion is wrong would be considered persona non grata unless that person could get a lot of money for the "cause" of liberalism. ****sheep****