General Category > Second Amendment

141 Congress members urge DOJ to withdraw pistol brace guidance that ‘will make millions of American

(1/1)

Elderberry:
American Military News by Liz George June 15, 2021

141 Congress members urge DOJ to withdraw pistol brace guidance that ‘will make millions of Americans, incl. disabled vets, criminals overnight’

Rep. Richard Hudson (R-NC), along with 140 other members of the House, sent a letter on Monday to Attorney General Merrick Garland and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Acting Director Marvin Richardson, urging the officials to withdraw suggested rules on stabilizing brace accessories, warning that the guidance would “make millions of law-abiding citizens, including disabled veterans, criminals overnight.”

The letter comes just more than one week after President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice introduced proposed guidance that would change the definition of a “rifle” to include any firearms with pistol stabilizing braces that have “objective design features and characteristics that indicate that the firearm is designed to be fired from the shoulder.”

The proposed rule change appears intended to reclassify AR-style pistols as rifles and, which would subject them to a more heavily regulated short-barrelled rifle (SBR) classification for rifles with a barrel length less than 16 inches.

“This proposed guidance is alarming and jeopardizes the rights of law-abiding gun owners and disabled combat veterans across the country,” the letter stated. “Should this guidance go into effect, a disabled combat veteran who has chosen the best stabilizing brace for their disability is now a felon unless they turn in or destroy the firearm, destroy the brace, or pay a $200 tax. Furthermore, it could make millions of law-abiding citizens felons overnight.”

More: https://americanmilitarynews.com/2021/06/141-congress-members-urge-doj-to-withdraw-pistol-brace-guidance-that-will-make-millions-of-americans-incl-disabled-vets-criminals-overnight/

libertybele:
Only 140 members of the House?  That doesn't look too promising.  We're screwed!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

Go to full version