Author Topic: SCOTUS Reverses Lower Court Decision on Firearm Possession  (Read 413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 382,878
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
SCOTUS Reverses Lower Court Decision on Firearm Possession
« on: June 10, 2021, 06:31:57 pm »
SCOTUS Reverses Lower Court Decision on Firearm Possession

AWR Hawkins 10 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) on Thursday overturned a lower court ruling regarding the application of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) to a felon who illegally possessed a gun but did not use it against another individual.

The ACCA mandates a 15-year minimum sentence for persons found guilty of illegally possessing a firearm who have three or more prior convictions for a “violent felony.”

Charles Borden, Jr., a felon, admitted to possessing the firearm and the government sought the 15-year enhanced ACCA sentence, but Borden argued that his possession did not cross the threshold of “the use of force ‘against the person of another.’”

A District Court rejected Borden’s argument, ruling him to be a “career criminal” and giving him the 15-year enhanced sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the District Court ruling.

However, on June 10, 2021, SCOTUS ruled 5-4 that mere felon-in-possession, even if “reckless,” is not sufficient to trigger the ACCA’s enhanced sentencing.

Justices Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Neil Gorsuch based their decision on overturning the 6th Circuit ruling on the ACCA’s phrase “against another.”

They noted, “The phrase ‘against another,’ when modifying a volitional action like the ‘use of force,’ demands that the perpetrator direct his force at another individual. Reckless conduct is not aimed in that prescribed manner.”

Justice Clarence Thomas, the fifth Justice ruling against the 6th Circuit in the 5-4 decision, concluded, “[The] ACCA’s elements clause does not encompass Borden’s conviction for reckless aggravated assault for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Voisine… A crime that can be committed through mere recklessness does not have as an element the ‘use of physical force’ because that phrase ‘has a well-understood meaning applying only to intentional acts designed to cause harm.’”

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/06/10/scotus-reverses-lower-court-decision-firearm-possession/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Online Cyber Liberty

  • Coffee! Donuts! Kittens!
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 80,075
  • Gender: Male
  • 🌵🌵🌵
Re: SCOTUS Reverses Lower Court Decision on Firearm Possession
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2021, 08:19:55 pm »
Roberts and Kavanaugh in the minority.
For unvaccinated, we are looking at a winter of severe illness and death — if you’re unvaccinated — for themselves, their families, and the hospitals they’ll soon overwhelm. Sloe Joe Biteme 12/16
I will NOT comply.
 
Castillo del Cyber Autonomous Zone ~~~~~>                          :dontfeed: