Bro! You just moved the goal posts! You asked what do we do when assertions about fraud are proven to be lies. None of the items I've listed here have been proven to be lies.OK, now we're back on the same hundred yard field, and again in agreement. The items I listed above are known issues of fact - they each actually happened - but whether they represent fraud and materially swung the election remains to be seen. The purpose of these audits, and why I support them, is to find that evidence if it exists or shut up if it doesn't.
No I have NOT. I have most earnestly, and always called for the TRUTH. I don't know that ANY of it is lies or not. Heck, I don't know if any of it is even REAL or not. I don't know how they have been spun (as in the case of legislatures where you and I are in agreement outside of the regular hue and cry). I don't know what's been left out. I do know that truth is what I pine for. Unequivocal and raw. That calls for proof all the way along.
The best way to do that is to take none of it as fact, and perform investigation on every jot and tittle. That is the essence of journalism, and it being lacking in today's reporting, either we have to stop harrumphing and speculating, and do the job the news refuses to do, or wait for the smoke to clear, and see what is proven in court. There is quite literally nothing in between. All else is the dense truth-choking smoke of twitterpation.
And I too favor the audits - All the audits you can bring. Balance the checkbook right down to the penny. That is what audits are for. And in that, providing the audits are suitably performed to be certified, That is fact. That is incontrovertible, and suitable for dissection within and without the court. The bottom line is where the truth will be found.
I am wholly in agreement with that.