Why Are Democrats So Afraid of Election Audits? By Charlie Kirk

[Smokin Joe]

Nonsense.

No, not so. It is a question of equal protection under the law.

Just as I have the inherent Right that my State's electors not be chosen on a basis of a fraudulent election, because that action in other states affects the outcome of the election, I have the same right to expect that their electors will be chosen in a constitutionally compliant manner. If my State must go by the rules, theirs must also. That assumes no control over the rules their legislature chooses to implement, just that their legislature be the authority which does so.

[libertybele]

This isn't rocket surgery. The SCOTUS is the court of original jurisdiction in matters between the States, and failed to address the issue, leaving no form of judicial relief.

That's pretty much it in a nutshell and consequently we have lost our Republic.

[Smokin Joe]

That's pretty much it in a nutshell and consequently we have lost our Republic.

Not yet. There is a question of legislative relief, but the matter is now up to the several states to settle, in their own respective legislatures. They have to recoup the power which has been usurped (by changing the rules back) and place statutory boundaries to prevent such usurpation in the future.

[Sled Dog]

Misplaced Trump votes are not so much the issue as "extra" Biden votes.

There is no mathematical difference between a Rodent destroying a valid Trump ballot or creating a fake Jo-Ho ballot out of thin illegal aliens.

Or even fat illegal aliens.

[Sled Dog]

Nonsense.

So you're saying the Rodents of PAWIGAMINHWI can conspire to steal enough electoral votes to defraud the election and the people of the other 44 states have no standing to object?

Be glad I didn't try to make a word out of the postal codes for the 44.

[Sled Dog]

Like in kind to the weight mega-cities hold over the states they are in, holding the rest of their state hostage... for decades now. Shall we impose a federal court decision to remediate that condition?

Or is it a matter of passive acquiescence where all we can do is pray those folks pull their heads outta their asses and take their states back?

I think you know the answer - Except your scenario was purposefully absurd, and my answer is IRL.
go figger.

The remediation for that is a Constitutional Amendment that awards Electors by Congressional district.   The candidate wins electors by winning the Congressional districts in a state, no "winner take all" and the two electors assigned per the Senate seats are awarded to the candidate who wins the plurality of the state.

That would alleviate a lot of the nonsense.

[Sled Dog]

Who decides which states have violated the Constitution and on what grounds?

Well, I guess I'll have to do it, since nobody who was Never Trump or a RINO can be trusted.

Or anybody else who can read the Constitution, which leaves out the Never Trumpers and Democrats.

[Cyber Liberty]

The remediation for that is a Constitutional Amendment that awards Electors by Congressional district.   The candidate wins electors by winning the Congressional districts in a state, no "winner take all" and the two electors assigned per the Senate seats are awarded to the candidate who wins the plurality of the state.

That would alleviate a lot of the nonsense.

Like Hell it would.  The Rats will simply shift gears and start cheating by CD. 

[Right_in_Virginia]

Nonsense.

No, equal protection and due process are not nonsense.  And both protections for all US citizens were discarded through the fraud in the 2020 election.  Breaking with these protections is against the law.

This is all true whether or not you agree with it, understand it, or like it.

[roamer_1]

No, equal protection and due process are not nonsense.  And both protections for all US citizens were discarded through the fraud in the 2020 election.  Breaking with these protections is against the law.

This is all true whether or not you agree with it, understand it, or like it.

No. Because now you have to have a decider.

[sneakypete]

The State of Texas does not have STANDING when six other states all violate the Constitutional election requirements and thereby install a usurper into the White House?

Really?    The Americans are just supposed to say "oh, that happened in Pennsylvania, and they can break the laws and install the president they want and I don't have any standing because the president lawfully elected by my votes lost an illegal COUP"? 

You clearly don't understand the concept of standing, or you just really like the lie the courts put out on the matter.

@Sled Dog

Well,ALL the states had a remedy for that at one time,and then the War of Northern Aggression (AKA: "The Yankee Bankers War") killed that.

Some ignorant people STILL think it had to do with ending slavery,when the truth it is had the opposite result and made us ALL slaves to Big Massa Goobermint.