Author Topic: Anthony Fauci: We Will Require Coronavirus Vaccine Booster Shots ‘Within a Year’  (Read 2171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online mystery-ak

  • Owner
  • Administrator
  • ******
  • Posts: 381,882
  • Gender: Female
  • Let's Go Brandon!
Anthony Fauci: We Will Require Coronavirus Vaccine Booster Shots ‘Within a Year’

Charlie Spiering 19 May 2021

Dr. Anthony Fauci estimated Americans will need a coronavirus booster vaccine shot within a year, he predicted at a media event sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.

“I think we will almost certainly require a booster sometime within a year or so, after getting the primary [shot], because the durability of protection against coronaviruses is generally not lifelong,” Fauci said about the future of the coronavirus vaccines.

The media event was organized by Axios and sponsored by PhRMA, a trade group representing the pharmaceutical industry.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/05/19/anthony-fauci-we-will-require-coronavirus-vaccine-booster-shots-within-a-year/
Proud Supporter of Tunnel to Towers
Support the USO
Democrat Party...the Party of Infanticide

“Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.”
-Matthew 6:34

Offline Wingnut

  • That is the problem with everything. They try and make it better without realizing the old is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,279
  • Gender: Male
I don't think so Scooter.  You are one corrupt little jab troll in big Phama's pocket.
Be gone you old discredited lying dwarf.   
I am just a Technicolor Dream Cat riding this kaleidoscope of life.

Offline roamer_1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43,314
I don't think so Scooter.  You are one corrupt little jab troll in big Phama's pocket.
Be gone you old discredited lying dwarf.   

YUP.  :beer:

Offline DefiantMassRINO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9,942
  • Gender: Male

There will be covid-19/sars-2 booster shots.  That genie is out of the bottle- thanks to the Chi-Coms and the WHO.

Dr. Fauci is probably using "require" in the medical sense and not the legal sense.  Nonetheless, it's a poor choice of words for any government official.
Self-Annointed Deplorable Expert Chowderhead Pundit

I reserve my God-given rights to be wrong and to be stupid at all times.
"If at first you don’t succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried." - Steven Wright

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
More Panic Porn BS.
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,644
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
As I told the lady giving me my second shot when she said they may require a third "NO, I'm two and done and won't be back for any more". Funny thing, my Advantage Plan provider just texted me yesterday that I could now go in for my vaccination..................................over a month after the state was open to everyone, such a deal. I shouldn't be surprised, their preferred clientele are of a browner south of the border skintone.

Online jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,327
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
Funny thing, my Advantage Plan provider just texted me yesterday that I could now go in for my vaccination..................................over a month after the state was open to everyone, such a deal. I shouldn't be surprised, their preferred clientele are of a browner south of the border skintone.
I had a similar situation.

When looking for shots, I noticed that a city clinic (I had once gone there to have some dental issues checked out) had a sign-up list for all three vaccines. When I went there before, I also noticed their usual clientele was Latino (even the dentist had a Spanish accent). You put your name on the list and they call you when there's an appointment available. To this day, I never got a call back--I ended up finding a same-day appointment for the Johnson & Johnson one-shot in another community a few days later.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
THE RED CROSS DOESN'T WANT BLOOD FROM THE VACCINATED

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kKJDrj8y8ALg/

The Red Cross says: "Anyone who has received their Covid-19 vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to help other Covid-19 patients in hospitals.

The vaccine wipes out the antibodies making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other Covid-19 patients."

"At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross."
https://www.redcrossblood.org/local-homepage/news/article/covid-19-vaccination-guide-blood-donation.html

If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
I see you didn't read the Red Cross article you linked. In particular you failed to read this:

Quote
When can I donate blood after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine?

The Red Cross is following FDA blood donation eligibility guidance for those who receive the COVID-19 vaccination. Deferral times for donations may vary depending on which brand of vaccine you received. If you’ve received a COVID-19 vaccine, you’ll need to provide the manufacturer name when you come to donate. In most cases, there is no deferral time for individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine as long as they are symptom-free and feeling well at the time of donation.

*The following eligibility guidelines apply to each COVID-19 vaccine received, including boosters: There is no deferral time for eligible blood donors who are vaccinated with a non-replicating inactivated or RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by AstraZeneca, Janssen/J&J, Moderna, Novavax, or Pfizer.

* Eligible blood donors who received a live attenuated COVID-19 vaccine or do not know what type of COVID-19 vaccine they received must wait two weeks before giving blood.

I shouldn't have to point this out, but no live attenuated COVID-19 vaccine is approved for use in the US, nor are any live attenuated COVID-19 vaccines in testing in the US.

You also missed this, which is very different from what you article claimed:

Quote
Can I donate COVID-19 convalescent plasma if I have received the vaccination?

At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross. The Red Cross is working as quickly as possible to evaluate this change – as it may involve complex system updates. Please know, the Red Cross is committed to building a readily available inventory of convalescent plasma to ensure patients battling COVID-19 have all treatment options available to them.

Where in that Red Cross webpage did the Red Cross say this: "The vaccine wipes out the antibodies making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other Covid-19 patients."
« Last Edit: May 20, 2021, 02:24:51 am by PeteS in CA »
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
I see you didn't read the Red Cross article you linked. In particular you failed to read this:


From the Red Cross link:

Quote
Can I donate COVID-19 convalescent plasma if I have received the vaccination?

At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross. The Red Cross is working as quickly as possible to evaluate this change – as it may involve complex system updates. Please know, the Red Cross is committed to building a readily available inventory of convalescent plasma to ensure patients battling COVID-19 have all treatment options available to them.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
From the Red Cross link:

The article you quoted and linked said:

Quote
THE RED CROSS DOESN'T WANT BLOOD FROM THE VACCINATED

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kKJDrj8y8ALg/

The Red Cross says: "Anyone who has received their Covid-19 vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to help other Covid-19 patients in hospitals.

The vaccine wipes out the antibodies making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other Covid-19 patients."

"At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross."
https://www.redcrossblood.org/local-homepage/news/article/covid-19-vaccination-guide-blood-donation.html

The article lied. It also attributed to the Red Cross something the Red Cross did not say
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
The title was wrong.  You are 100% correct.  But I didn't post it for the title.  I posted it for the the convalescent plasma info.  It is interesting that the Red Cross takes this position.  The conclusion is that the vaccine has a detrimental effect on natural antibodies, diminishing their effectiveness in plasma treatment.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Online mountaineer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 78,135
Quote
Workers failed to shower, change clothes at plant with botched J&J doses: report
By Jesse O’Neill
May 19, 2021 | 7:00pm
New York Post

Staffers at a Baltimore manufacturing plant — where 15 million doses of Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine were botched — didn’t shower or change clothes before entering the manufacturing area, according to a report released Wednesday.

In a three week period between January and February, there were more than three dozen instances of personnel at Emergent BioSolutions entering the manufacturing area without documentation of a shower — violating protocol, according to an FDA report released by a Congressional House committee.

In one instance, an associate only documented one shower in 19 days of work, the report said.

Inspectors also found problems with mold and unsatisfactory sanitation of plant equipment — and documented workers mishandling medical waste. ...
But sure, please require us to get a vaccine, Tony.
Support Israel's emergency medical service. afmda.org

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
The title was wrong.  You are 100% correct.  But I didn't post it for the title.  I posted it for the the convalescent plasma info.  It is interesting that the Red Cross takes this position.  The conclusion is that the vaccine has a detrimental effect on natural antibodies, diminishing their effectiveness in plasma treatment.

Is that your conclusion or is that described somewhere in medical testing?  I do appreciate the link you shared and the info.

Or is it the difficulty in testing in telling the differences between the antibodies that limit the infection (focused on the spike protein) versus antibodies that surround the virus?  (probably not)

Or is it differences in compensation for plasma?

Or is it FDA approval to date is limited to only using the antibodies from infection for convalescent plasma treatment.  And testing from antibodies from vaccine have not yet been tested AND given FDA approval for use? (I am guessing this is the cause)

This article talks a bit more about it (without answering any of the questions above).  They are testing all donations including blood for the possibility of using the plasma for convalescent plasma to treat.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-redcross-vaccinated/fact-check-red-cross-is-accepting-plasma-from-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19-idUSL1N2MR1HU
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
The title was wrong.  You are 100% correct.  But I didn't post it for the title.  I posted it for the the convalescent plasma info.  It is interesting that the Red Cross takes this position.  The conclusion is that the vaccine has a detrimental effect on natural antibodies, diminishing their effectiveness in plasma treatment.

Vaccines do not work the way the anonymous bitchute author/video producer claimed. The antibodies from the vaccine attack the SARS2 virus, not other antibodies. The Red Cross actually made their reasoning clear:

Quote
Can I donate COVID-19 convalescent plasma if I have received the vaccination?

At this time individuals who have received a COVID-19 vaccine are not able to donate convalescent plasma with the Red Cross. The Red Cross is working as quickly as possible to evaluate this change – as it may involve complex system updates. Please know, the Red Cross is committed to building a readily available inventory of convalescent plasma to ensure patients battling COVID-19 have all treatment options available to them.

A vaccinated person's immune system is more complex wrt the SARS2 virus, and the Red Cross needs to track the several factors. So "at this time" would be donors of convalescent plasma will be deferred, which means that a time may soon come when such people will be allowed to donate convalescent plasma.

Convalescent plasma has issues. It's a very mature technology, but the concentration of antibodies varies considerably from donor to donor. I can only speak hypothetically, but while I would not refuse convalescent plasma if that's what was available, I would prefer either Eli Lilly's or Regeneron's monoclonal antibody treatment because of the controlled dosage.
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
Is that your conclusion or is that described somewhere in medical testing?  I do appreciate the link you shared and the info.

@thackney

It was the conclusion of the author based on the one premise given.  The premise (i.e. the Red Cross policy on plasma donations) leads to other questions, just as you have done.  For example:

  • Why does the new vaccine disqualify the effectiveness of the plasma treatment?

  • Why should a virus survivor and plasma donor subsequently get the vaccine, thus disqualifying themselves from future plasma donations?

  • Is there something in the spike antibodies that inhibits the natural virus antibodies?

  • Why isn't the media reporting this?



If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
But sure, please require us to get a vaccine, Tony.

 *****rollingeyes***** The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are not produced by Emergent BioSolutions.

 *****rollingeyes***** None of the botched J&J vaccine produced at that Emergent BioSolutions facility was distributed, because the FDA still had not approved the facility for production of the J&J vaccine.
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
Vaccines do not work the way the anonymous bitchute author/video producer claimed.

@PeteS in CA

Again, the point was in reference to the factual evidence presented (i.e. the Red Cross policy).  The rest is the opinion of the BitChute author.


The Red Cross actually made their reasoning clear:

A vaccinated person's immune system is more complex wrt the SARS2 virus, and the Red Cross needs to track the several factors. So "at this time" would be donors of convalescent plasma will be deferred, which means that a time may soon come when such people will be allowed to donate convalescent plasma.

There is nothing "clear" about that, other than their current policy is to deny vaccine recipients from donating plasma (although they will still take their blood).  My own personal experience with the Red Cross proves them to be a very inflexible organization.  So I hold out zero hope that this policy will change at a later date.


Convalescent plasma has issues. It's a very mature technology, but the concentration of antibodies varies considerably from donor to donor.

That should be independent of whether or not a donor has been vaccinated.  There is no pre-test for virus survivors to see just how high their antibody count is.  However, it is only the vaccinated that are now universally banned from being donors (which is typical of Red Cross policy universalization).  So again, what makes them special?  And why should any current plasma donor get vaccinated since it could mean a lifetime ban for plasma donation?



If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
There is nothing "clear" about that, other than their current policy is to deny vaccine recipients from donating plasma (although they will still take their blood).  My own personal experience with the Red Cross proves them to be a very inflexible organization.  So I hold out zero hope that this policy will change at a later date.

Just for clarity, the can donate plasma.  The Red Cross will not take plasma specifically donated for Covid convalescent plasma to treat Covid.  General plasma donations continue as described in my link above.

But the also say they will test ALL donation for the antibodies to be able to use for Covid treatment.  Which sounds like double-speak to me.

My experience with them as well is very unflexible.  I used to donate blood every opportunity from high school age.  After living in Yemen and travelling through Djibouti, it eventually was such a continued hassle with the extra forms and delays I gave up.

Quote
That should be independent of whether or not a donor has been vaccinated.  There is no pre-test for virus survivors to see just how high their antibody count is.  However, it is only the vaccinated that are now universally banned from being donors (which is typical of Red Cross policy universalization).  So again, what makes them special?  And why should any current plasma donor get vaccinated since it could mean a lifetime ban for plasma donation?

There is a relatively short time window because of the natural drop in antibodies.  Are you sure they do not test that quantity?
« Last Edit: May 20, 2021, 03:31:19 pm by thackney »
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
@Hoodat

Sorry, I went back and read the Red Cross statements again in their reply to Reuters about the February policy and it sounds like another contradiction.

Quote
...The Red Cross is evaluating the “feasibility” and “timeline” of implementing new February 2021 guidance from the FDA, which says (here) that COVID-19 convalescent plasma should not be collected from people who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 unless they have had COVID-19 in the past six months and received the vaccine after they were diagnosed with COVID-19...

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-redcross-vaccinated/fact-check-red-cross-is-accepting-plasma-from-people-vaccinated-against-covid-19-idUSL1N2MR1HU
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline PeteS in CA

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,028
IOW, the Red Cross' deferral policy is related to paperwork and tracking, not some imaginary "problem" of antibodies attacking antibodies.

The last time I attempted to donate blood, I was deferred. They considered my resting heart rate dangerously slow. Now that that issue has been dealt with, I could again donate. IOW, "Deferral" is different from "Disqualified".

Thanks for the clarification, @thackney, wrt ordinary plasma donation. It does not surprise me that the Red Cross accepts plasma donations from vaccinated individuals, but I hadn't looked into it.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2021, 04:14:24 pm by PeteS in CA »
If, as anti-Covid-vaxxers claim, https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2021/robert-f-kennedy-jr-said-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-the-deadliest-vaccine-ever-made-thats-not-true/ , https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2021/11/23/covid-shots-are-the-deadliest-vaccines-in-medical-history/ , The Vaccine is deadly, where in the US have Pfizer and Moderna hidden the millions of bodies of those who died of "vaccine injury"? Is reality a Big Pharma Shill?

Millions now living should have died. Anti-Covid-Vaxxer ghouls hardest hit.

Online Hoodat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,837
My experience with them as well is very unflexible.

The last time I attempted to donate blood, I was deferred.

@thackney   @PeteS in CA

At the ripe age of 20, I cleaned myself up, stopped drinking and drugging, and began my recovery to become a responsible productive member of society.  After being clean and sober for about a year, I decided to start giving back by donating blood.  A big part of my spiritual recovery involved rigorous honesty, so I was truthful on their little questionnaire.

My reward for this effort was to be permanently blacklisted from ever donating blood again.  Twenty years later, we incurred a blood shortage.  The Red Cross was asking for donors, so I went back and tried to donate again, figuring that if I was still alive with 20 years of sobriety, that my blood was OK.  This time, they didn't give me the usual questionnaire, but instead had me list as much personal information about me as possible such as address, phone number, DL number, SSN, etc.  I found out later that the reason for this was to update their ban list.

The Red Cross now occupies a permanent place on my sh!t list.  I simply cannot deal with unreasonable folks.  Meanwhile, I can go to the plasma bank in the 'hood and get paid for my plasma, no questions asked.

No good deed goes unpunished.
If a political party does not have its foundation in the determination to advance a cause that is right and that is moral, then it is not a political party; it is merely a conspiracy to seize power.

-Dwight Eisenhower-


"The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals ... it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government ... it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen's protection against the government."

-Ayn Rand-

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
@Hoodat

I think the 3rd time donating blood with the Red Cross me and my buddy nearly got thrown out mid-donation liter until a supervisor intervened.

My buddy and I were placed next to each other, and two different nurses hooked us up to the bag at nearly the same time.  After they walked away one of us said to the other: "Race Ya!"

We were squeezing that thing as fast as we could trying to pump it out the quickest.

No sense of humor at all.  I miss the days when the donations were given at the local volunteer firehouse and we got a shot of liquor afterwards for donating, even us 17 year olds.
 
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline Wingnut

  • That is the problem with everything. They try and make it better without realizing the old is fine.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26,279
  • Gender: Male
The Jab troll is walking back his "3rd Jab" will be needed coment.  He now says that whether a Covid-19 vaccine booster shot will be needed in the next year remains an open question. "The bottom line is, we don't know if or when we will need booster shots, But it would be foolish not to prepare for the eventuality that we might need it." 

All hail Doctor Douchebag.
I am just a Technicolor Dream Cat riding this kaleidoscope of life.

Online LadyLiberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,679
  • Gender: Female
Anthony Fauci: We Will Require Coronavirus Vaccine Booster Shots ‘Within a Year’

Charlie Spiering 19 May 2021

Dr. Anthony Fauci estimated Americans will need a coronavirus booster vaccine shot within a year, he predicted at a media event sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.

I think we will almost certainly require a booster sometime within a year or so, after getting the primary [shot], because the durability of protection against coronaviruses is generally not lifelong,” Fauci said about the future of the coronavirus vaccines.

The media event was organized by Axios and sponsored by PhRMA, a trade group representing the pharmaceutical industry.

more
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/05/19/anthony-fauci-we-will-require-coronavirus-vaccine-booster-shots-within-a-year/

If immunity has lasted 17+ years so far in those who recovered from SARS-CoV, what makes him say that immunity from SARS-CoV-2 will be any different? He's just pulling that stoopid opinion out of his *** for attention.

"we showed that patients (n = 23) who recovered from SARS (the disease associated with SARS-CoV infection) possess long-lasting memory T cells that are reactive to the N protein of SARS-CoV 17 years after the outbreak of SARS in 2003; these T cells displayed robust cross-reactivity to the N protein of SARS-CoV-2. "

Source:  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z