General Category > SCOTUS News
Laity Notifies Harris Counsel of Docketing of “Eligibility” Case
Elderberry:
The Post & Email 5/6/2021
The plaintiff in a case challenging Kamala Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as vice president of the United States has notified Harris’s attorney that the case has been docketed at the U.S. Supreme Court.
On Wednesday Robert C. Laity sent the required notification form to Beth S. Brinkmann, partner at Covington & Burling, one of the firm’s attorneys representing Harris.
A letter dated April 28, 2021 informed Laity of the case’s docketing under the number 20-1503.
Laity petitioned the high court for a writ of certiorari after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia declined to hear the matter en banc. A three-judge panel in March declared the case “frivolous” and Laity to lack “standing,” then threatened monetary sanctions which it declined to impose upon the issuance of its opinion.
More: https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/05/06/laity-notifies-harris-counsel-of-docketing-of-eligibility-case/
Sled Dog:
--- Quote ---In his petition Laity argued that Harris is “constitutionally barred” from serving as vice president or president as a result of her birth in California to two non-U.S.-citizen parents who were attending college on student visas at the time. Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen,” while the 12th Amendment imposes the same requirements for president on any vice-presidential candidate.
--- End quote ---
AND it goes to the Fourteenth Amendment as well. Why would any child born of non-citizen aliens be considered a US citizen? They're not "under the jurisdiction thereof" the United States, they're citizens of some s-hole country elsewhere.
But magic dirt is magic dirt, I guess.
Elderberry:
Laity Files with SCOTUS for Rehearing
The Post & Email 6/18/2021
https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/06/18/laity-files-with-scotus-for-rehearing/
--- Quote ---As promised, plaintiff Robert C. Laity has filed a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Supreme Court on his petition for a writ of certiorari concerning whether or not Kamala Harris is eligible to serve as vice president of the United States.
On June 1, 2021, the high court denied Laity’s petition without comment or dissent from any of its members. Prior to his appeal to the Supreme Court in April, Laity was told by lower courts that he lacked “standing” and/or that his objection to Harris’s presumed constitutional eligibility was “frivolous.”
In response, Laity wrote:
The evidence is overwhelming that Kamala Devi Harris is not the bona-fide Vice-President of the United States because she does not meet Article II and 12th Amendment criteria that she be a “Natural Born Citizen.” That this court suggested sua sponte that my appeal is ‘”frivolous” (that there is no serious purpose or value) in trying to ensure that our highest offices are not breached gives me great cause for concern.
--- End quote ---
jmyrlefuller:
--- Quote from: Sled Dog on May 07, 2021, 12:53:47 pm ---AND it goes to the Fourteenth Amendment as well. Why would any child born of non-citizen aliens be considered a US citizen? They're not "under the jurisdiction thereof" the United States, they're citizens of some s-hole country elsewhere.
But magic dirt is magic dirt, I guess.
--- End quote ---
Were the parents here lawfully? If yes, then they submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Unlike an illegal alien.
Sled Dog:
--- Quote from: jmyrlefuller on June 19, 2021, 01:00:06 pm --- Were the parents here lawfully? If yes, then they submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the United States.
Unlike an illegal alien.
--- End quote ---
Saying "they were here lawfully" implies that merely being here on a tourist visa is sufficient to confer US citizenship on spawn. That is not the intention of the 14th Amendment.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version