Author Topic: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future  (Read 1279 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

May 5, 2021

Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future

Lasers, robot tanks, hypersonic missiles, and more.
by Michael Peck

Here's What You Need to Remember: These future weapons should begin to be used within the next few years.

The U.S. Army already fields an impressive array of weapons. But as the U.S. Army prepares itself for potential conflicts against high-tech Russian and Chinese armies, the Army is working on a slew of new systems ranging from tanks to missiles.

The result will be the gradual disappearance of the familiar weapons born during the Cold War -- the Abrams tanks and Apache helicopters -- that symbolize America's arsenal. In their place will be a new generation of weapons.

Here are five that we will likely see in the coming years:

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/enemies-beware-these-are-us-militarys-weapons-future-184382

Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
Why do we never hear about CHAMP? CHAMP may be the most significant tactical weapon ever developed and fielded. It will dominate the next war. CHAMP (Counter electronics High powered Advanced Missile Project) was fully developed and fielded almost ten years ago (http://www.boeing.com/features/2012/10/bds-champ-10-22-12.page).

It is an EMP (ElectroMagnetic Pulse) weapon capable of disabling small circuits through the battlefield. Aircraft that rely on printed circuits to fly will be grounded, missile guidance systems will fail to function, radios will become inoperable, computers will cease to work, tank gunnery/laser systems will become inoperable… even the complex electronics required to detonate a nuclear weapon will become useless. CHAMP is online and ready. Yet we rarely hear anything about it.

Most people think of nuclear blasts when they hear “EMP”. But EMP today is much easier to generate. CHAMP can be mounted under the wing of an aircraft like a missile or rocket pod.
So how does it work? First, it must be understood that EMP is NOT radiation and cannot be shielded against like radiation. Radiation is particles (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, etc). Dense lead can block these particles and “shield” against radiation. EMP is NOT particles. It is magnetism. It cannot be blocked like radiation. Your home microwave oven is a microwave (EMP generator, that is why you cannot put metal in it. The entire planet cannot block the magnetism created at the center of the earth… that’s why we have magnetic poles.
EMP consists of an expanding and contracting magnetic field. A generator moves a (ferrous) metal material in a static magnetic field and induces current. EMP takes a moving (expanding and contracting) magnetic field and exposes a stationary object to it. A generator moves the object… EMP moves the field. The effect is the same: induced current. When your grandma turned on too many lights and appliances, the fuse in the cellar carried too much current and the fuse “burned out”. EMP does that to microcircuits. Too much electrical current “fuses” the circuits in a computer, a radio, etc.

The one defense is a “Faraday Cage”. A simple Faraday Cage can be constructed from a metal “GI” trash can. Line the can with a metallic fabric and insulate it from the can itself. Ground the fabric. Place the items to be protected inside. If an EMP attack occurs, the magnetism will induce current in the fabric and be grounded. The equipment inside will be safe.

The problem is that if the slightest pinhole is present in the can or the fabric, the EMP will reach the objects inside. This means no connectors can access the protected equipment. You cannot use the equipment until you remove it from the cage. Then it is vulnerable to EMP once again.
In the 1980’s, it was  assumed that one of the six counterbattery radars in a counter-artillery battery was a microwave (EMP) generator with an effects “fan” of about forty degrees and a range of about 45 kilometers. There’s nothing really new here except the equipment has gotten small and lighter.
So why don’t we hear more about it?

Is it too scary to be contemplated? Strategic use of EMP could ruin any modern nation. For a look at its impact on a national scale, you might read “One Second After” by William R. Forstchen. It has a forward by Newt Gingrich.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Whether it is radioactive particles or electromagnetic waves it is still "radiation". Just different kinds.

Fiber optics is unaffected by EMP. So yes, you can shield something from EMP and pass high speed data in and out of that shielded enclosure. Shielding is pretty straightforward unless the energy levels are extreme - like from a nuke. The EMP field strength declines rapidly because an expanding sphere's surface area increases exponentially with the radius. And it takes a lot energy over a small area to damage small modern electronics.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Another thing. A Faraday Cage does not have to be conductive fabric. Fabric just makes it so you can see in and out of the enclosure. The size of the fabric's openings determine the upper frequency limit of its effectiveness. Sheet metal without openings works just fine as long as all the edges are fully soldered or welded. Machined or cast metals are what is typically used for shielding. With solid metals there's no upper frequency limit limiting its effectiveness.

Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
Again, radiations is particles. Magnetism is not. Apples and space shuttles when it comes to "shielding".

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Again, radiations is particles. Magnetism is not. Apples and space shuttles when it comes to "shielding".

No.

For example a light bulb radiates light when on. An antenna radiates an electromagnetic field when transmitting.

Light and radio waves are the same thing, just different frequencies.

Definition of radiation:

[ˌrādēˈāSH(ə)n]

NOUN
physics - the emission of energy as electromagnetic waves or as moving subatomic particles, especially high-energy particles which cause ionization.


Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
That's a dictionary. Not science. The fact remains that a dense material such as lead will block radiation (Alpha, Beta, Gamma PARTICLES) to a large degree. It has absolutely no ability to block magnetism. As I stated before, you can protect yourself from radiation with lead and other dense materials. The entire earth cannot block the magnetism generated by he molten core of the earth. If you think lead will protect you from EMP... go for it. But the rules of Physics decree it won't help at all and you will be sitting in the dark.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
That's a dictionary. Not science. The fact remains that a dense material such as lead will block radiation (Alpha, Beta, Gamma PARTICLES) to a large degree. It has absolutely no ability to block magnetism. As I stated before, you can protect yourself from radiation with lead and other dense materials. The entire earth cannot block the magnetism generated by he molten core of the earth. If you think lead will protect you from EMP... go for it. But the rules of Physics decree it won't help at all and you will be sitting in the dark.

That's the physics definition of radiation. It defines more than just particle radiation...

As far as blocking magnetic fields, that depends on the rate the magnetic field changes in strength or orientation. A static magnetic field does not induce a current in a conductor. And without inducing a current it doesn't do anything to electronic devices. And yes it passively passes through pretty much everything. An EMP uses a magnetic pulse to induces currents in conductors. In that case it can be blocked even with a nonferromagnetic materials like aluminum and copper. The pulse induces a large current in the metal and the metal in turn generates an opposing magnetic field due to that induced current. That greatly neutralizes the rapidly changing field. That's how a Faraday Cage works.

Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
Light is made of PARTICLES called photons. These particles can be blocked by a window shade. Light is PARTICLES. EMP is NOT PARTICLES and cannot be blocked the same way.

A generator moves ferrous metals through a static magnetic field. This induces current in the metal. The magnetic field is static and the metal moves. EMP use the same principal only the metal is static and the magnetic field moves (expands and contracts). The effect on the metal is the same weather it ids the field moving through a static piece of metal or the metal moving through a static magnetic field. Current is induced.

A Faraday Cage captures the effects of the moving magnetic field before it can reach the equipment being protected. It induces current in the surrounding metal and grounds it. Leaving the equipment unaffected.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Light is made of PARTICLES called photons. These particles can be blocked by a window shade. Light is PARTICLES. EMP is NOT PARTICLES and cannot be blocked the same way.

A generator moves ferrous metals through a static magnetic field. This induces current in the metal. The magnetic field is static and the metal moves. EMP use the same principal only the metal is static and the magnetic field moves (expands and contracts). The effect on the metal is the same weather it ids the field moving through a static piece of metal or the metal moving through a static magnetic field. Current is induced.

A Faraday Cage captures the effects of the moving magnetic field before it can reach the equipment being protected. It induces current in the surrounding metal and grounds it. Leaving the equipment unaffected.

Definition of photon: The photon is a type of elementary particle. It is the quantum of the electromagnetic field including electromagnetic radiation such as light and radio waves, and the force carrier for the electromagnetic force (even when static via virtual particles).

Hence radio waves and light are the same thing. Just different frequencies.

A Faraday Cage has nothing to do with grounding something. It doesn't matter if the cage is grounded or not. External fluctuating magnetic fields induce eddy currents in the metal forming the cage. Those eddy currents generate a magnetic field with the opposite polarity of the field causing the eddy currents effectively cancelling it out. The better the conductor surrounding what is being shielded the the higher the attenuation of the magnetic field interacting with it.  An EMP only works because of the rapid rate of change of the magnetic field it generates. That rapid change is what induces currents in the conductive shielding and is why it can be blocked.

Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
Re: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future
« Reply #10 on: May 11, 2021, 02:57:15 am »
"Usually you build your Faraday cage around the plasma to screen the devices outside the cage. If you have an (ungrounded) cage the source of the electric field within the cage will create a charge accumulation on the inside. This, on the other hand, leads to an equally large net charge on the outside (of the opposite charge sign). And this can be very harmfull for you.
So, if you ground the cage the additional charge will rather go to the ground than flow over your body when you touch the cage."
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why-do-radiation-shields-such-as-Faraday-cages-have-to-be-grounded

Having said that, my purpose in starting is thread wasn't to discuss Faraday Cages. It was to discuss the presence of fully developed, fully fielded non-nuclear EMP weapons that will make future wars almost devoid of aircraft, radios, computers, lasers, and so much more. The discussion I started was in response to someone talking about new missiles and other weapons... which could all be disabled by EMP weapons.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Re: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future
« Reply #11 on: May 11, 2021, 03:13:25 am »
"Usually you build your Faraday cage around the plasma to screen the devices outside the cage. If you have an (ungrounded) cage the source of the electric field within the cage will create a charge accumulation on the inside. This, on the other hand, leads to an equally large net charge on the outside (of the opposite charge sign). And this can be very harmfull for you.
So, if you ground the cage the additional charge will rather go to the ground than flow over your body when you touch the cage."
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why-do-radiation-shields-such-as-Faraday-cages-have-to-be-grounded

Having said that, my purpose in starting is thread wasn't to discuss Faraday Cages. It was to discuss the presence of fully developed, fully fielded non-nuclear EMP weapons that will make future wars almost devoid of aircraft, radios, computers, lasers, and so much more. The discussion I started was in response to someone talking about new missiles and other weapons... which could all be disabled by EMP weapons.

Containing electrostatic charges is an entirely different use of a Faraday Cage and not related to the discussion of EMP and electromagnetic fields.

Offline AARguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 461
Re: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2021, 03:28:07 am »
EMP induces current in metal in exactly the same way a generator does. The presence of current means there is a difference in potential between point A and point B. This means that point A is more negative than point B (or vice versa). This, in turn, means that the inside of the cage is charged. The inside is not attached to the outside. So if the inside is positively charged, it will create a negative charge on the outside in exactly the same way as a capacitors two plates are oppositely charged. If the outer surface is not grounded, this charge will have nowhere to go and remain there. That's what my "researchgate.net" source meant by "So, if you ground the cage the additional charge will rather go to the ground than flow over your body when you touch the cage."

But, again, my whole point here is that battlefield EMP weapons will disable almost everything on the next battlefield but Soldiers and their rifles.

Offline DB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,211
Re: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2021, 04:42:31 am »
That difference in potential is very small because the metal (for shielding purposes) is a good conductor even with very large currents circulating through it. It does not mean the cage is charged nor does it cause the cage to become charged. The circulating currents are balanced in the conductor leaving no imbalance to provide a charge.

Online GtHawk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18,775
  • Gender: Male
  • I don't believe in Trump anymore, he's an illusion
Re: Enemies Beware: These Are the U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2021, 05:35:39 pm »
U.S. Military's Weapons of the Future if the democrats get their way  note the high tech laser and led illumination.