State Chapters > Arizona
Trump: Results of Election Audit “Will be Very Interesting”
skeeter:
--- Quote from: HikerGuy83 on May 02, 2021, 05:54:12 pm ---What does the GOP not believe about previous audits ?
--- End quote ---
I believe previous recounts accurately reflected the original vote count. But a recount is different from an audit.
Cyber Liberty:
@HikerGuy83
In answer to your question(s) about previous audits, there have not been any until now. The ballots were "canvassed" in November, which is standard procedure. Canvassing is recounting a small sample of the ballots, and there is supposed to be further examination if the recount shows an error rate of a fraction of a percent. The samples in Maricopa County showed greater than a 1% error rate, and that error counted Trump votes as a Biteme vote on Election day. The error rate in the canvas could have easily been enough to swing the close election.
And this was a half-assed machine canvas, not hand count. Worse, even though it showed an unacceptable error rate, there was no further analysis done because the R Governor and AG, along with the Rat Secretary of State nixed it.
What is going on right now is a 100% audit, which is much more than a simple recount. Ballots are being UV scanned for the proper watermarks. The Dominion counting machines (all 400 or so of them) are being checked to see if they were tampered with. And yes, it's a hand count.
This Audit was made necessary by the Democrats' and RINOs' refusal to follow procedure and do deeper recounts when the Canvassing failed (and make no mistake, it failed! That's the "previous audit" we have problems with).
Cyber Liberty:
--- Quote from: skeeter on May 02, 2021, 07:20:52 pm ---I believe previous recounts accurately reflected the original vote count. But a recount is different from an audit.
--- End quote ---
No they dint! The early canvassing showed an unacceptable error rate (by law), but attempts to take it further were nixed by Rats and RINOs. All illegal.
skeeter:
--- Quote from: Cyber Liberty on May 02, 2021, 07:36:50 pm ---
No they dint! The early canvassing showed an unacceptable error rate (by law), but attempts to take it further were nixed by Rats and RINOs. All illegal.
--- End quote ---
Isn't that saying the same thing? Recount vs audit?
HikerGuy83:
--- Quote from: Cyber Liberty on May 02, 2021, 07:35:01 pm ---@HikerGuy83
In answer to your question(s) about previous audits, there have not been any until now. The ballots were "canvassed" in November, which is standard procedure. Canvassing is recounting a small sample of the ballots, and there is supposed to be further examination if the recount shows an error rate of a fraction of a percent. The samples in Maricopa County showed greater than a 1% error rate, and that error counted Trump votes as a Biteme vote on Election day. The error rate in the canvas could have easily been enough to swing the close election.
And this was a half-assed machine canvas, not hand count. Worse, even though it showed an unacceptable error rate, there was no further analysis done because the R Governor and AG, along with the Rat Secretary of State nixed it.
What is going on right now is a 100% audit, which is much more than a simple recount. Ballots are being UV scanned for the proper watermarks. The Dominion counting machines (all 400 or so of them) are being checked to see if they were tampered with. And yes, it's a hand count.
This Audit was made necessary by the Democrats' and RINOs' refusal to follow procedure and do deeper recounts when the Canvassing failed (and make no mistake, it failed! That's the "previous audit" we have problems with).
--- End quote ---
The way this is being explained is that the GOP is conducting this "in secret". I don't know how that could be.
And the real question I have is....just what is the outcome.
Just looking at the way it was set up.....it can't have any legal impact on the election.
Is that true ?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version