Author Topic: Faulting ERCOT, insurer says it shouldn't have to cover storm damages  (Read 192 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,408
Houston Chronicle by Paul Takahashi 4/8/2021

ERCOT’s insurance company is seeking a court ruling excusing it from defending Texas’ electric grid manager from lawsuits or covering damages stemming from the catastrophic power failure in February.

The Cincinnati Insurance Co. on Tuesday sought relief from the U.S. district court in Austin, arguing it does not have to defend the Electric Reliability Council of Texas because it does not view the power outages as an accident, defined by the insurer as a “fortuitous, unexpected, and unintended event.” As a result, the company said it has no obligation under its insurance policy to cover ERCOT, which faces a flood of lawsuits after the winter storm.

“The allegations in the Underlying Lawsuits allege ERCOT either knew, should have known, expected, and/or intended, that Winter Storm Uri would cause the same power outages which occurred as a result of previous storms in Texas, including storms in 1989 and 2011,” the insurer said in court documents. “The Underlying Lawsuits allege the power outages caused by Winter Storm Uri were a result of the exact same failures including failures of the same generators which failed in the previous winter storms, and therefore, the power outages were foreseeable, expected, and/or intended.”

More: https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/Faulting-ERCOT-insurer-says-it-shouldn-t-have-16087501.php

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Re: Faulting ERCOT, insurer says it shouldn't have to cover storm damages
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2021, 01:54:00 pm »
This would be massive in impact.  It would not just be limited to this single storm if it went forward, I think...
Life is fragile, handle with prayer