Supreme Court sits on potentially blockbuster abortion case

[mystery-ak]

Supreme Court sits on potentially blockbuster abortion case
by Nicholas Rowan, Staff Writer |
 | March 28, 2021 07:00 AM

The Supreme Court is sitting on a petition in a Mississippi abortion case that could blow the lid off Roe v. Wade.

The case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, has been before the court since September without a word from the justices. It has been considered at the court’s conferences eight times and each time left on the table. That likely means that fewer than four justices so far have voted to take up the case. Another possibility is that the court has already rejected the case and one of the conservative justices is working on a dissent that will be released in one of the court’s orders list.

The lack of action at this point in either direction is surprising to some anti-abortion advocates, who, especially after former President Donald Trump’s administration appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett to the court, expected the court to weigh in on the controversial issue.

more
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/supreme-court-blockbuster-abortion

[Sled Dog]

The Court has no courage.  They refuse to defend the Constitution all across the board.   Murdering babies is only one of the things it supports by rejecting to hear cases.

[PeteS in CA]

BREAKING: Supreme Court Takes Up Dismemberment Abortion Case

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2021/03/29/breaking-supreme-court-takes-up-dismemberment-abortion-case-n1435829

On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it would consider the case Cameron v. EMW Women’s Surgical Center, which centers on Kentucky’s ban on dismemberment abortions, also known as dilation and evacuation (D&E) abortions. The Court is not likely to weigh the merits of the purported constitutional “right” to abortion enshrined in Roe v. Wade (1973) and later cases, however.

In April 2018, Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin (R) signed H.B. 454 into law, banning any practice that involves “the bodily dismemberment, crushing, or human vivisection of the unborn child.” Yet after Bevin lost his reelection campaign in 2018, his successor, Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, did not direct his administration to keep defending H.B. 454. Beshear’s health secretary did defend the law until the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an injunction against it.

Attorney General Daniel Cameron (R) attempted to defend the law himself, but the Sixth Circuit did not allow him to represent the state in court. The Supreme Court will take up the question of whether or not Cameron can defend the law when the Beshear administration will not.

[jafo2010]

It is a misnomer to believe this court is conservative.  Roberts is NOT a conservative.  And based on two of the three appointed by Trump, they are suspect as well.

Comey Barrett is a big nothing!!!!!!

[libertybele]

It is a misnomer to believe this court is conservative.  Roberts is NOT a conservative.  And based on two of the three appointed by Trump, they are suspect as well.

Comey Barrett is a big nothing!!!!!!

Absolutely agree.  Roberts has ruled with liberal bias. Those appointed by Trump have been extremely disappointing to say the least.