Author Topic: Feed Me - Uri Scrambles Gulf Coast Gas Flows, Briefly Shuts Off Texas LNG Feedgas  (Read 478 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Feed Me - Uri Scrambles Gulf Coast Gas Flows, Briefly Shuts Off Texas LNG Feedgas
https://rbnenergy.com/feed-me-uri-scrambles-gulf-coast-gas-flows-briefly-shuts-off-texas-lng-feedgas
02/23/2021

...The Lone Star State has a vast network of gas pipelines, the largest in the country in fact, including nearly 430,000 miles of regulated and non-regulated intrastate pipelines — systems that are entirely within state boundaries — and almost 20,000 miles of interstate gas transmission pipeline. Together the combination of production and gathering, distribution, and transmission lines account for one-sixth of the total U.S. gas pipeline network, according to the Railroad Commission (RRC) of Texas. Many of the transmission lines that criss-cross the state, east-west or north-south, are bidirectional, including the interstate pipelines. These interstate systems historically flowed only northbound but have been modified in recent years to also flow south as an influx of supply from Appalachia’s Marcellus/Utica shales has displaced Texas’s outflows from markets in the U.S. Southeast and, to some extent, in the Midcontinent, and as the build-out of LNG export terminals has increased gas demand along the Gulf Coast.

Despite the extensive pipeline network, it’s not surprising that an event like Winter Storm Uri, which generated record demand, would create constraints on these legacy pipes, particularly for gas coming into the state. That’s because they were built to “telescope” in the wrong direction for today’s market — they were originally designed to take on increasing amounts of gas supply as they moved northeast toward Louisiana, so the pipeline diameter and, thus, capacity gets smaller the farther south they go (see our Miles and Miles of Texas series for more on Texas pipeline network evolution). So even with the bidirectionality, capacity is limited, and that’s without the cold weather-related issues that physically limited the pipelines’ ability to flow at high rates. As for pipes crossing the state east to west, those are primarily fed by Permian Basin gas supply, and as we noted in East is East, West is West, freeze-offs severely crippled those volumes during Uri.

The diagram in Figure 1 shows the key gas hubs in Texas and the dominant directions of flows from each.



...Permian Outflows Plummeted. Last week in East is East, West is West and Terminal Frost, we discussed the severe production shortfall that occurred due to freeze-offs and contributed to the shortage. Much of that supply has since bounced back, according to the latest data from the RBN NATGAS Permian Report (see the dark-blue 2021 line in left graph, Figure 2). As production volumes fell off earlier last week, however, and Waha Hub spot prices screamed higher to more than $200/MMBtu in trading for February 17, outflows cratered, dropping to less than a fourth of what they were averaging year-to-date before the winter storm.



Total outflows went from an average 11 Bcf/d across pipelines year-to-date before Uri, to a low of about 2.5 Bcf/d on February 16. The right graph in Figure 2 breaks out the volumes by direction of flow. Flows east via the three intrastate corridors combined (yellow line), which make up the largest chunk of Permian exports, fell the most volume-wise — from upwards of 6 Bcf/d on average pre-Uri, to barely above 1 Bcf/d on February 15-17 (low point inside dashed blue rectangle) — but those remained the highest volumes among the corridors as the gas-starved Houston and Dallas markets priced to attract whatever molecules they could (the cash price at HSC averaged $400/MMBtu in trading for gas day February 17, carrying a stout $200/MMBtu premium to Waha for that day, according to NGI’s daily spot price index; more on HSC when we get to Gulf Coast gas flows in a bit).

Flows on the other corridors dropped to minimal levels and, in the case of the North and West corridors, flows even reversed to move more gas into Texas. Flows north (gray line, right graph) had averaged right around 1 Bcf/d in January and increased to about 1.5 Bcf/d in early February as a cold snap increased demand in the Midwest. As the polar air plunged into Texas, those volumes declined and flipped to net inbound, with as much as 400-500 MMcf/d coming into the Permian/Texas area for a couple of days (February 17-18)....

Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline HoustonSam

  • "That'll be the day......"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,982
  • Gender: Male
  • old times there are not forgotten
Many thanks for continuing to share this kind of insight @thackney.  It really helps understand some of the complications that have arisen in running infrastructure "backwards", to move NG in the opposite direction to the original design.

That TX accounts for 1/6 the total US gas pipeline network, with 430,000 miles intrastate, is phenomenal.  Frankly that latter number is hard to believe, any chance that's a misprint or misinterpretation?  Would that include, for example, the steel pipe that brings gas into my house?
James 1:20

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Many thanks for continuing to share this kind of insight @thackney.  It really helps understand some of the complications that have arisen in running infrastructure "backwards", to move NG in the opposite direction to the original design.

That TX accounts for 1/6 the total US gas pipeline network, with 430,000 miles intrastate, is phenomenal.  Frankly that latter number is hard to believe, any chance that's a misprint or misinterpretation?  Would that include, for example, the steel pipe that brings gas into my house?

No, that should not include low pressure distribution to customer, but I belive that includes gathering lines from wells to gas plants and the like.  Let me see if I can find a source.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
No, that should not include low pressure distribution to customer, but I belive that includes gathering lines from wells to gas plants and the like.  Let me see if I can find a source.

@HoustonSam

I am wrong.  That number does include 107,978 miles of natural gas distribution, piping to customers like residential.  That number also includes liquids like oil.  It does not include water lines.

https://www.rrc.state.tx.us/pipeline-safety/reports/texas-pipeline-system-mileage/
« Last Edit: February 24, 2021, 03:07:16 pm by thackney »
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
It really helps understand some of the complications that have arisen in running infrastructure "backwards", to move NG in the opposite direction to the original design.

Natural Gas Compressor Stations, or Liquid Pump Stations on pipelines have a suction and a discharge valve working in one direction only.  A typical station would easily require a couple hundred thousand in additional equipment and controls per unit to be bi-directional.  Nearly every pipeline in existence is built to only flow one way. 

You can bypass the compressors and pumps and let it "naturally" flow in the opposite direction, but you get very low flow rates without any booster stations to keep pushing it along.
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
For those curious, here is a typical major gas pipeline with the delivery and injection points along the way plus the compressor stations.  I am familiar with this one since I helped on the a couple of the expansion projects.

Florida Gas Transmission company map
https://fgttransfer.energytransfer.com/ipost/FGT/maps/system-map
Life is fragile, handle with prayer

Offline HoustonSam

  • "That'll be the day......"
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,982
  • Gender: Male
  • old times there are not forgotten
@HoustonSam

I am wrong.  That number does include 107,978 miles of natural gas distribution, piping to customers like residential.  That number also includes liquids like oil.  It does not include water lines.

https://www.rrc.state.tx.us/pipeline-safety/reports/texas-pipeline-system-mileage/

Thanks again.  Actual numbers aside, the qualitative message remains the same I think - TX is heavily "wired in" to NG and includes a corresponding infrastructure as large as most countries would require.
James 1:20

Offline Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,365
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
I think Texas ought to look into making at least some of these pipelines bi-directional, even at lower capacity, in order to cope with emergency situations as they experienced during the last few weeks.

How long did the last Maunder Minimum last...?

Offline thackney

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,267
  • Gender: Male
I think Texas ought to look into making at least some of these pipelines bi-directional, even at lower capacity, in order to cope with emergency situations as they experienced during the last few weeks.

How long did the last Maunder Minimum last...?

When you say "Texas" do you mean tax payers?  Or the companies that own the pipelines (but not the gas) should spend millions of dollars for something that happens almost never?  And since they don't own the gas, how would they recover the cost?
Life is fragile, handle with prayer