Saturday, November 14, 2020
The New York Times inkspillers attack Isaac Newton
Isaac Newton has founded not only classical mechanics but also true quantitative science – physics rooted in advanced mathematics – in his seminal three-volume 1687 Principia (Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica). The world-changing importance of this text is self-evident to everyone who isn't brain-dead.
Now, this story starts with a simple question: How many copies of the opus' first edition were there? 189 were known so far (and one was auctioned for $3.7 million in 2016, a record price for a science book). This number was clearly a lower bound and after some census, "sleuths in Europe" found 198 more, as the article makes clear, including new copies in Prague. I am almost certain that there were many thousands and the "number of copies we still possess" and the "number of copies that have existed" are two wildly different numbers. Why should almost all copies be preserved for almost 350 years?
But look how The New York Times is spinning this innocent story about the unimportant question about the number of copies:
Newton’s 'Principia' Had a Surprisingly Wide Audience, Historians Find (a backup)
OK, so the readers are told that it was "surprising" that the Principia had a wide audience. At many places, the article suggests that the audience should be small because it was a "daunting" text etc. What? Are you serious? This propaganda is so incredibly outrageous.
https://motls.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-new-york-times-inkspillers-attack.html