The PCR test detects mRNA of unknown origin.
THe test detects all manner of other mRNA. The testing companies state that the test will show positives for other coronaviruses and some flus.
I'm going to go through my vast collection of ACTUAL science and see if I can find the link to this information. Because they have never isolated the virus per the China CDC director in his own words as interviewed by NBC news, there is no way to prove that the mRNA tests for and finds after 40 cycles belongs to the virus. The virus has never been isolated. The "genome" that the "scientists" have cobbled together by computer modeling, guesswork, and "consensus" is not Science.
Anyone who allows a concoction of mRNA (which the human body produces tens of thousands of these proteins) and dead baby or monkey kidneys and God only knows what other poisons may or may not live to be sorry. The Pzifer vaccine label states that it does not contain the "virus." By definition, a vaccine contains killed or attenuated virus and this unproven experimental treatment does not.
We have months of empirical evidence that masks not only do not work but are making ill. We know that the PCR test results in 90% of more of false positives, and now we are calling an experimental treatment a vaccine. Many will die shortly after the injection, many more will develop autoimmune diseases down the line.
For a period of time in Texas over 20,000 people foolish enough to take the crap PCR test had a positive result, yet a handful of people were actually sick and there's no telling what they had.
As promised, here is the proof of how flawed the PCR testis, from the literature of the testing companies:
excerpt:
From the FDA: “LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR test EUA Summary – December 9, 2020; EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARY COVID-19 RT-PCR TEST (LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA)†[pg 2] [6]:
“…The SARS-CoV-2RNA [COVID virus] is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection. Positive results are indicative of the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA; clinical correlation with patient history and other diagnostic information is necessary to determine patient infection status…THE AGENT DETECTED MAY NOT BE THE DEFINITE CAUSE OF DISEASE (CAPS are mine). Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities.â€
Translation: On the one hand, we claim the test can “generally†detect the presence of the COVID virus in a patient. But we admit that “the agent detected†on the test, by which we mean COVID virus, “may not be the definite cause of disease.†We also admit that, unless the patient has an acute infection, we can’t find COVID. Therefore, the idea of “asymptomatic patients†confirmed by the test is nonsense. And even though a positive test for COVID may not indicate the actual cause of disease, all positive tests must be reported—and they will be counted as “COVID cases.†Regardless.From a manufacturer of PCR test kit elements, Creative Diagnostics, “SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit†[7] [7a]:
“Regulatory status: For research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures.â€
Translation: Don’t use the test result alone to diagnose infection or disease. Oops.
“Specificity: non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc.â€
Translation: Although this company states the test can detect COVID, it also states the test can read FALSELY positive if the patient has one of a number of other irrelevant viruses in his body. What is the test proving, then? Who knows? Flip a coin.
“Application: Qualitativeâ€
Translation: This clearly means the test is not suited to detect how much virus is in the patient’s body. That’s another indication that the test is useless for determining whether the patient is ill—since millions and millions of virus must be present, in order to produce illness.“The detection result of this product is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment. The clinical management of patients should be considered in combination with their symptoms/signs, history, other laboratory tests and treatment responses. The detection results should not be directly used as the evidence for clinical diagnosis, and are only for the reference of clinicians.â€
Translation: Don’t use the test as the exclusive basis for diagnosing a person with COVID. And yet, this is exactly what health authorities are doing all over the world. All positive tests must be reported to government agencies, and they are counted as COVID cases.Those quotes, from official government and testing sources, torpedo the whole “scientific†basis of the test.
CONCLUSION: The PCR test is useless and deceptive. It provides de facto dictators the opportunity to cite “new case levels†and lock down populations, creating economic and human devastation.https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/02/...their-own-lies/
