Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active – And NOT ONE SINGL

[Elderberry]

Gateway Pundit by Joe Hoft 1/24/2021

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Accurate List of 2020 Election Fraud Cases Shows 81 Cases Total, 30 Still Active – And NOT ONE SINGLE COURT Has Allowed Evidence to be Argued

The 2020 election will go down as arguably the greatest fraud in world history.  The tremendously popular incumbent candidate, President Trump, was easily winning the race on election night in a landslide and then suddenly multiple states took a break, quit counting, and by the end of the week the election was flipped to Joe Biden.
Then, as the President and his team attempted to address the fraud and alleged abnormalities, the courts refused in any case evidence to be brought before a court of law.

We’ve heard over and over from Big Media that President Trump and his team lost numerous court cases linked to the 2020 election.  But this is not accurate.

Here’s what we identified from our research of an accurate and updated list of court cases:

•   There are 81 court cases to date based on the 2020 election
•   In 45 cases President Trump was the plaintiff
•   In 34 cases President Trump is not the plaintiff
•   In 2 cases President Trump is the defendant
•   In 72 cases illegal voting is alleged
•   In ZERO of the 72 cases where illegal voting is alleged has evidence been allowed to be presented
•   30 cases remain active

 Here is a link to the list of cases.  Notice this file is updated on an ad hoc basis so numbers may change.

2020 Election Court Cases by Jim Hoft on Scribd

More: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/breaking-exclusive-accurate-list-2020-election-fraud-cases-shows-81-cases-total-31-still-active-not-one-single-court-allowed-evidence-argued/

[Texas Yellow Rose]

 

[mikezpen]

Why wasn't evidence allowed to be presented?

[Elderberry]

The fix was in.

[mikezpen]

Meaning what? All these courts were fixed? Need a better answer.

[catfish1957]

A "move along.... nothing to see here" exercise on a massive scale.

Us rubes must submit and comply.  /s

[skeeter]

Meaning what? All these courts were fixed? Need a better answer.

Did governors illegally change election laws? yes
Where there clear cases of bad ballots being fixed in one area which were not allowed in another? yes
Were republican watchers kicked out of counting rooms? yes
Are there actual videos of massive cheating taking place? yes
Are there dozens upon dozens of sworn affidavits signed under penalty of perjury claiming fraud? yes
Did thousands of dead people vote? yes illegal aliens? yes people with no address? yes duplicate voters? yes yes yes

But has a single court allowed evidence to be presented? no

Draw your own conclusions.

[Elderberry]

Meaning what? All these courts were fixed? Need a better answer.

Then ask each and every judge that disallowed the evidence.

[Cyber Liberty]

Then ask each and every judge that disallowed the evidence.

Start with John Roberts and all 3 Justices appointed by Trump.

[IsailedawayfromFR]

This one was filed in court before the election and the evidence was accepted and approved by the court.

Unfortunately, it came months after the election.

As the Texas suit, it proves we cannot rely upon the courts for sorting out election fraud and illegalities.

Virginia Proposed a Rule Change Allowing Late Ballots with No Postmarks. Here's what a Judge Had to Say.

It’s not going to overturn the results of the 2020 election, but a judge has ruled that the Virginia Board of Elections broke the law during the 2020 cycle. The board had permitted ballots without postmarks that arrived three days after Election Day to be counted through a proposed rule change last summer. The legal challenge was filed by the Public Interest Legal Foundation, who called the decision a big win for the rule of law (via Daily Caller):

The Virginia Board of Elections rule allowing officials to count ballots that arrived without a postmark up to three days after the election was illegal, a state judge ruled.

Virginia Circuit Court Judge William Eldridge ruled the state’s late mail-in ballot law violated state statute and permanently banned the law in future Virginia elections, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (PILF) announced Monday. PILF sued the state’s board of elections in October on behalf of Thomas Reed, a Frederick County, Virginia election official.

The board of elections proposed the rule during an Aug. 4 meeting and related guidance was sent to election officials statewide on Aug. 13 informing them of the change. PILF sued on behalf of Reed on Oct. 9, according to a news release.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2021/01/27/judge-va-late-postmark-rule-for-ballots-violated-the-law-n2583783