I posted this in the thread about the UK's guidance:
I took a look at the information -- 2/3 out of the first 360 people had adverse side affects. They listed a percentage of participants had systemic events ... again 2/3 out of 360 people. The study then lists 2/3 of 6,000 had systemic events.
IMO 2/3 is a lot of people! That's more than 1/2.
2/3 seems to be the magic number of people displaying side affects regardless of low dose, mid dose or high dose.
My question is how many of these people would have remained asymptomatic even if exposed to the virus?
Maybe I missed it but I didn't see a more definitive list of people who shouldn't get the vaccine. Allergies are pretty common in a lot of people and adverse reactions to medications could mean a lot of things; soreness, joint paint, decreased liver or kidney function, hospitalization, etc.
Also I keep in mind all the meds that are advertised and their numerous side affects and how they went through the normal testing protocols to get approved.