@Cyber Liberty@mystery-ak I read the article:
Article said: "The justices won’t end up deciding the 2020 presidential race, but they have set the stage for a massive rollback of voting rights."
The article is as
@Bigun said; it was written by a lib. The information is correct, but it doesn't mean a "massive rollback of voting rights" as the article says.
Article mentions "Purcell Principle". Never heard of that, looked it up. It is, "don't make changes to voting rules close to an election." That explains exactly what happened in this election. No one had thought of an election when there is a pandemic killing people. It happened, and states were faced with millions of people crammed together to vote, so some states "changed" the rules for voting by mail. Each state did their own thing.
Millions went for mail ballots and did not do it correctly, so they were thrown out. One cannot expect a rule change close to an election, to get to voters. Well, let me change that - a State rule change close to an election, does not get to THE PEOPLE HOLDING THE ELECTION. Why is that? People don't read. They think someone will tell them what they need to know.
I taught election judges and clerks how to run the election in their polling precinct. So, who was responsible for teaching them so they would know any new rule change? I was. I kept up with any new rules/laws in the Texas Election Code. I found out from reading the Texas Secretary of State's, Election Division, website. From there I could find any new laws that would affect our next election.
The above paragraph is true, but never was there a new law/rule close to an election. It did not happen, but it happened this time in numerous states due to the "freakin" virus.
What all the above says is, we had this happen, so fix any law/rule now before there is another election. Get the rules set for mail ballots now. And I would like this Purcell Principle to be law - can't change the rules close to an election.