I'm not quite sure what you mean, but I'll try again. I understand that you can't abide those of us who didn't like either major party candidate. Who reject the demand that we choose between two evils.
@Jazzhead I can appreciate that. You are essentially saying is that being opposed to a candidate is simply a disincentive to vote. In other words, it is NOT an incentive to vote for the other candidate. If one opposes Candidate A and Candidate B, one does not vote for either A or B.
Applying that to the election, 130,000 people in just two Georgia counties who have never voted before will
NOT become miraculously motivated first-time voters for Candidate B solely because they oppose Candidate A - an anomally that incidentally was not repeated in any of the remaining 157 Georgia counties. Thanks for confirming that for everyone.
There may have been millions of us overall, judging by the myriad examples of GOP Senate and House incumbents who drew more votes than Trump.
In Georgia, that was not the case. As has been pointed out to you
repeatedly,
99.973% of those voting for Republican Senate candidates also voted for Trump. Trump even received more votes than all the Republican House candidates put together. Not sure why you are still trying to BS us with this same tired disproven premise.
Trump lost the popular vote by six million, twice as much as he did in 2016.
Trump collected 74 million votes - 11 million more than he did in 2016.
I know that's irrelevant
Yet you brought it up anyway as if it actually meant something.
I'd like to save at least a few of them, and that's why the Georgia Senate runoffs are so important.
For the umpteenth time, how do you expect to win the Georgia runoffs when the same opportunity for fraud in the November election will be equally available in the runoffs, except this time, the incentive to cheat is a few magnitudes higher?
No question that voters of all stripes were motivated this year as never before.
On the Trump side, that was clear. Anywhere across the country that Trump visited, tens of thousands showed up to greet him. And even in places he didn't visit, groups of supporters got together and held their own support rallies. And that support materialized into the highest vote total for a Republican Presidential candidate in US history. Millions who were scared off by Trump in 2016 came around to vote for him in 2020.
On the Biden side, the exact opposite was true. There were no big campaign gatherings. There were no spontaneous rallies. There was no demand for Biden to even show his face. No press conferences. Even the few appearances Biden made failed to draw more than a few dozen supporters.
In short, there was no motivation for Biden. None, other than he had a 'D' after his name. That would have been good for 65 million votes for any Democrat who actually campaigned (which Biden didn't).
Let's make it local for you. When Trump shows up for a rally in Scranton, PA, thousands waited in line for hours to see him. Yet the day before the election Biden holds a campaign block party which didn't even draw two dozen. Yet somehow 70,000 more people turned out in your county to vote for Joe Biden than turned out for Hillary Clinton or Obama? There is no conceivable way that this legitimately happened. Thus the need to kick Republicans out of the election centers and do most of the tabulating between 12 midnight and 6 am.
