Giuliani Wants Supreme Court to Decide Election

[mystery-ak]

Jeffrey Rodack    |   Tuesday, 17 November 2020 01:48 PM


Rudy Giuliani, the attorney for President Donald Trump, said the campaign is prepared to lose election cases in an effort to throw the final decision on the presidential race to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Giuliani’s comments came during a Tuesday interview on Fox Business' "Mornings With Maria."

The Daily Mail reported that Giuliani was due to appear in court remotely on Tuesday in a case involving an attempt to have hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots removed from the count in Pennsylvania.

“Frankly this is a case that we would like to get to the Supreme Court,” he said. “So we're prepared in some of these cases to lose and to appeal and to get it to the Supreme Court.

“You might remember in Bush v. Gore, the Bush campaign lost in the state of Florida because it was a Democratic court. You're not going to win every one of these ... but in some cases you win, some cases you lose.”

Trump has maintained he would “easily” be declared the victor in the race if just the “legal votes" were counted.Jeffrey Rodack    |   Tuesday, 17 November 2020 01:48 PM


more
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/rudy-giuliani-lawsuits/2020/11/17/id/997453/

[Hoodat]

Giuliani wants voters to decide election.  Unfortunately, criminal election workers, ballot harvesters, and software hackers are deciding this one so far.

[aligncare]

I don’t believe Giuliani said he wants the Supreme Court to decide the election, but that it rule on lower court cases before it which alleged election fraud.

What’s to be done about a tainted election—wrong word, maybe spoiled, ruined, wreaked, invalidated works better—that’s up to the legislative bodies, state and federal.

[Hoodat]

This case was just thrown out of court.
From the 5-2 opinion from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court:
"Critically, we find the Board’s regulations as applied herein were reasonable in that they allowed candidate representatives to observe the Board conducting its activities as prescribed under the Election Code."
https://www.timesunion.com/news/article/Trump-campaign-lawsuit-over-Pennsylvania-vote-15732498.php

Your linked article is about Federal court, not Commonwealth court.  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the hearing of this case.

[rustynail]

Sorry for the mix up.

[Cyber Liberty]

I'm disappointed Newsmax would put a headline like this up.  It's the sort of thing I'd have expected from CNN.  And just when they were getting traction against Fox.   

[Hoodat]

I'm disappointed Newsmax would put a headline like this up.  It's the sort of thing I'd have expected from CNN.  And just when they were getting traction against Fox.   

I never was a Newsmax fan precisely for that reason.  But OAN is working for me.  I've only seen them miss it once.