You are acting like there is an alternative. Provide a solution, or avoid snark quotes that have zilch applicability
It is not snark. Your choice is between Marxist globalists or corporate socialist globalists. Go ahead. Choose.
As for me, I will not. I will give my endorsement to those who deserve it. That falls within the distinct parameters of principled conservatism, because within those parameters globalism cannot survive... And neither can Marxism/Socialism.
What is missing is opposition. The false choice is preventing opposition, as it has all the way along.
Marxism cannot exist without central control of government And corporate cronyism cannot exist in federalism, where a central government does not have the wherewithal to rule with summary decrees - The principles of Conservatism, of civil-libertarianism and fiscal conservatism wholly prevent all of it from existing. Ergo, it is counter-productive entirely to lend your endorsement to the continuation of anything else. Because in endorsing either current choice continues both, shading out the opposition which liberty demands.
My vote for a Constitution Party candidate, or my abstinence, either one, is better than endorsing the continued Kabuki theater, and promotes opposition. To BOTH. As it should be.
All Y'all are doing nothing different than the Bushies or the McCainiacs, or the Romneyites... All hyphenated 'conservatisims' that eliminated principle things - And the things not done were the things that pushed socialism forward, without opposition... In fact often defended by the right.
And thus it comes, lauded in the cacophony raised by both sides, upending the very things that both sides stand for.
As I said, the only winning move is not to play. It does not matter which side wins - Liberty will suffer either way... What must come is opposition. REAL opposition, according to Conservatism's principles.
In that I will happily lend my vote, and my livelihood, and my treasure. ANYTHING LESS is doing nothing anyway.
