Pardon me if you were being facetious, but would a lunatic do those things you would credit him with? The worst I'll say about Trump is he often engages mouth before brain, which may be a character trait of many from Queens. Regarding his leadership in the White House, which is what should really matter to all of us, I haven't seen any better in my lifetime.
I'm not being facetious. Although I'm no psychologist, I consider Trump's most obvious, defining trait to be narcissism, and I consider it extreme. In contrast to the media and democrats, I do not find Trump to be a racist, power-hungry, or dictatorial; most of the criticism of Trump delivered by the "mainstream media" is simply lies. But I find his narcissism to be a severe limitation on the quality of his leadership, because leadership is fundamentally influence. The turnover his administration has experienced at the cabinet and WH staff level tells me that his influence is disabling, rather than enabling, for many capable people. Refusing to accept accountability, consistently deflecting blame, under-cutting his subordinates, and elevating disagreement to puerile and needless personal controversy are not the marks of an effective leader.
In spite of that narcissism, his administration has accomplished some very desirable things for the country, and I'll add to that initial list the recent peace agreements. His administration has done better than I expected and it seems slam-dunk obvious that a second Trump term will be far better for the country than any democrat administration; so while I did not vote for him in 2016 I will be voting for him this year.
Deciding that a vote for Trump is clearly my best choice in 2020 does not mean ignoring his glaring personal and character faults or pretending that he is something more than what we can all plainly see.