White House, Trump campaign: Kamala Harris is eligible to serve as VP

[libertybele]

Until WE collectively rise up and put an end to it the erosion of the Constitution will continue unabated!  If that does not happen soon, it won't make a damned bit of difference either way!

I absolutely agree!  I really shudder to think of someone like Ilhan Omar running for president -- she IS a naturalized citizen -- with neither parent a citizen when she was born...at the rate this issue is going, we've got big problems on our hands.

[Bigun]

Well, shit, does Idi Amin have any surviving relatives? How about the Kims? Let's just let any sonofabitch in the stinking world have a go at it.

Committing a crime and getting away with it does not set precedent. Only contempt for the Law, especially the supreme law of the land by the people charged with "protecting and defending the Constitution" does.

Why lose the Republic when the people who supposedly defend it, "Conservatives", are willing to just give it away without a fight?

 

[libertybele]

Well, shit, does Idi Amin have any surviving relatives? How about the Kims? Let's just let any sonofabitch in the stinking world have a go at it.

Committing a crime and getting away with it does not set precedent. Only contempt for the Law, especially the supreme law of the land by the people charged with "protecting and defending the Constitution" does.

Why lose the Republic when the people who supposedly defend it, "Conservatives", are willing to just give it away without a fight?

I agree.  However (and again, not saying that it makes it right) if I recall correctly there were several court challenges involving Obama's eligibility and either the cases were either thrown out or ruled against. 

Here we sit.

[Bigun]

If they won't stand up and fight for the Constitution's standards on who can be president and vice president, what makes you think they will stand up and fight for ANY part of it?  Including the bill of rights.

[libertybele]

If they won't stand up and fight for the Constitution's standards on who can be president and vice president, what makes you think they will stand up and fight for ANY part of it?  Including the bill of rights.

Well, my assessment is that there are very few in Congress who stand up FOR the Constitution anymore. A lot of our society seems to have lost that connection or even have some knowledge of, which I believe could be remedied by mandating that each high school student take at least one semester on the U.S. Constitution in order to graduate.   

Education IMHO is key -- it's how we get there in order to do so.

[Smokin Joe]

I agree.  However (and again, not saying that it makes it right) if I recall correctly there were several court challenges involving Obama's eligibility and either the cases were either thrown out or ruled against. 

Here we sit.

Every time Clinton appointees ruled the plaintiffs had no 'standing' before he was elected, and none would approach the issue after the election. THe media made their smokescreen about the issue, trotting out the whole Conspiracy Theory canard, and few dared to broach the subject, being derided as "Birthers" by both the Left and alleged Conservatives alike.

Let's not keep making the same idiotic mistakes of letting the Constitution be used for toilet paper.
Toilet paper isn't that scarce, and there is the salient issue that NEITHER one of her Parents were American Citizens, different from any of the others. Her only claim to citizenship comes from a misreading of the 14th Amendment, in effect making her an 'anchor baby'.

Or have those who claim to be conservatives become so wishy-washy they won't even grow enough spine to stand up for the Letter of the Law? If not, I'd better start selling my stuff while I can still get something for it, and figure out what country I'm going to show up at as a refugee from America.

Maybe this sort of crap is the reason America isn't listed, even metaphorically, in end times Prophesy in the Bible.

[Cyber Liberty]

I agree.  However (and again, not saying that it makes it right) if I recall correctly there were several court challenges involving Obama's eligibility and either the cases were either thrown out or ruled against. 

Here we sit.

All of the challenges to O'Bastard's eligibility were tossed by the courts, one by one.  Some legit, and some laughable (I remember some Dentist gal who filed a pro per challenge.  "Taitz?"), but no Plaintiff could rise to the level of even having the "standing" to sue.  Amazingly, even people who were actual Electors in the Electoral College did not have standing to challenge!

[Bigun]

All of the challenges to O'Bastard's eligibility were tossed by the courts, one by one.  Some legit, and some laughable (I remember some Dentist gal who filed a pro per challenge.  "Taitz?"), but no Plaintiff could rise to the level of even having the "standing" to sue.  Amazingly, even people who were actual Electors in the Electoral College did not have standing to challenge!

So what would YOU recommend we do @Cyber Liberty I'm genuinely interested in knowing.

[Cyber Liberty]

So what would YOU recommend we do @Cyber Liberty I'm genuinely interested in knowing.

 

I don't have an answer.

[Bigun]

I don't have an answer.

Well the answer cannot be to just shut up and sit down can it?

[Cyber Liberty]

Well the answer cannot be to just shut up and sit down can it?

Is somebody telling you to do that?  I don't think I did, I don't believe for a nanosecond you would do it....

[Bigun]

Is somebody telling you to do that?  I don't think I did, I don't believe for a nanosecond you would do it....

I wasn't asking specifically about myself. I was asking a general question that really only requires a yes or no answer.

[libertybele]

Every time Clinton appointees ruled the plaintiffs had no 'standing' before he was elected, and none would approach the issue after the election. THe media made their smokescreen about the issue, trotting out the whole Conspiracy Theory canard, and few dared to broach the subject, being derided as "Birthers" by both the Left and alleged Conservatives alike.

Let's not keep making the same idiotic mistakes of letting the Constitution be used for toilet paper.
Toilet paper isn't that scarce, and there is the salient issue that NEITHER one of her Parents were American Citizens, different from any of the others. Her only claim to citizenship comes from a misreading of the 14th Amendment, in effect making her an 'anchor baby'.

Or have those who claim to be conservatives become so wishy-washy they won't even grow enough spine to stand up for the Letter of the Law? If not, I'd better start selling my stuff while I can still get something for it, and figure out what country I'm going to show up at as a refugee from America.

Maybe this sort of crap is the reason America isn't listed, even metaphorically, in end times Prophesy in the Bible.

Even the issue of "anchor baby" has been silenced.

I for one have a problem with every Maria that sneaks across the border and gives birth which in essence gives citizenship to that child and then all the crying liberal lunatics so it is inhumane to separate child from mother.  Fine ... since the mother IS not a citizen, then she needs to pick up her new bambino and waltz it back across the border!

[Cyber Liberty]

I wasn't asking specifically about myself. I was asking a general question that really only requires a yes or no answer.

Fair enough.

"No, we should not just sit and take it."

[Bigun]

Fair enough.

"No, we should not just sit and take it."

Thank you!  That's the way I see it as well.

[Bigun]

Even the issue of "anchor baby" has been silenced.

I for one have a problem with every Maria that sneaks across the border and gives birth which in essence gives citizenship to that child and then all the crying liberal lunatics so it is inhumane to separate child from mother.  Fine ... since the mother IS not a citizen, then she needs to pick up her new bambino and waltz it back across the border!

Exactly right!   

And BTW: The people who made the 14th law were very clear as to what they were doing and that was granting citizenship to former slaves who had been born and raised in this country.  Nothing else.

[Cyber Liberty]

Thank you!  That's the way I see it as well.

The practical question would be, "How do we proceed?" and that's why the 

[Bigun]

The practical question would be, "How do we proceed?" and that's why the 

I'm working on it! But it's quite clear that a bunch of individuals speaking as individuals and thus easily be ignored by the powers that be isn't going to cut it!  It's going to have to be something that brings all those people together so that they can speak as one IMHO.

[berdie]

Even the issue of "anchor baby" has been silenced.

I for one have a problem with every Maria that sneaks across the border and gives birth which in essence gives citizenship to that child and then all the crying liberal lunatics so it is inhumane to separate child from mother.  Fine ... since the mother IS not a citizen, then she needs to pick up her new bambino and waltz it back across the border!

I totally agree. The anchor baby issue is a blatant, deliberate misuse of the Constitution.

[catfish1957]

I totally agree. The anchor baby issue is a blatant, deliberate misuse of the Constitution.

Fully agree.  Our government should have ended the anchor baby technicality when we had a chance.  In a post socialist dim run country? Will never happen.