Pentagon dismisses 'unserious' debate over potential military involvement in any post-election disp

[rangerrebew]

Pentagon dismisses 'unserious' debate over potential military involvement in any post-election dispute
By Rebecca Kheel - 08/13/20 12:21 PM EDT
 

The Pentagon on Thursday dismissed talk of potential military involvement in any post-election dispute, calling the debate "unserious thought."

“We have a Constitution, and our Constitution, which all members of the military have sworn an oath to, provides no role for the U.S. military as arbiter of political or election disputes,” chief Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said at a press briefing.

“This issue appears to be borne of unserious thought reflecting a fundamental lack of appreciation for the history of our democracy and the civilian-military relationship established under our Constitution,” he added.

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/511848-pentagon-dismisses-unserious-debates-about-military-involvement-in-potential

[Cyber Liberty]

Meanwhile, I hope the military has a plan in their back pocket to crush riots by idiots wearing p*ssy hats.

[Fishrrman]

Cyber wrote:
"Meanwhile, I hope the military has a plan in their back pocket to crush riots by idiots wearing p*ssy hats."

Jes' like they "crushed" the ones in Seattle, Portland, Chicago and New York, right...?

[Cyber Liberty]

Cyber wrote:
"Meanwhile, I hope the military has a plan in their back pocket to crush riots by idiots wearing p*ssy hats."

Jes' like they "crushed" the ones in Seattle, Portland, Chicago and New York, right...?

These would be in DeeCee.