Author Topic: US Army announces 5 civilian experts to lead independent review of Fort Hood amid soldier deaths  (Read 347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest
US Army announces 5 civilian experts to lead independent review of Fort Hood amid soldier deaths
 

FORT HOOD, Texas – The Secretary of the Army announced Thursday the five civilian experts will lead an independent review of Fort Hood.

The purpose of the review is to determine whether the climate and culture at Fort Hood and surrounding military community “reflect the Army’s values, including safety, respect, inclusiveness, and a commitment to diversity, and workplaces and communities free from sexual harassment,” a release said.

The panel members that will lead the review are Chris Swecker, former assistant director of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division, Jonathan Harmon, chairman of McGuireWoods LLP, Carrie Ricci, an assistant general counsel for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Queta Rodriguez, a regional director for veteran career readiness organization FourBlock, and Jack White, a partner at Fluet Huber + Hoang, has broad expertise in government investigations.

https://www.click2houston.com/news/texas/2020/07/30/us-army-announces-5-civilian-experts-to-lead-independent-review-of-fort-hood-amid-soldier-deaths/

rangerrebew

  • Guest

The purpose of the review is to determine whether the climate and culture at Fort Hood and surrounding military community “reflect the Army’s values, including safety, respect, inclusiveness, and a commitment to diversity, and workplaces and communities free from sexual harassment,” a release said.


The real reason is PC.  They're blowing smoke out their *sses to make it look like they are trying to clean things up.  There have been American military murdered all over the world in recent months so why did they pick Ft. Hood?  To cover some people with stars on their shoulders.  If their star studded shoulders had been doing their jobs to begin with, such an investigation wouldn't be needed.