Author Topic: The New York Times’ new standard for acceptable op-eds  (Read 167 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

Posted on June 5, 2020 by Paul Mirengoff i

The New York Times’ new standard for acceptable op-eds

As Scott recounted this morning, Tom Cotton entered the public’s consciousness in 2006 when Power Line published a letter he wrote that the New York Times had rejected. The letter attacked two Times reporters who had undermined U.S. anti-terrorism efforts by writing about a highly classified terrorist finance tracking program.

Tom had a strong personal stake. The men he was leading on patrols through the streets of Baghdad were exposed to attack by terrorists whose funding the U.S. was trying to halt.

In the intervening fourteen years, Cotton has become a U.S. Senator and an important national figure. He no longer relies on letters to the editor, or on Power Line, to make his views known to the reading public. Indeed, the Times itself has published his op-eds.

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/06/the-new-york-times-new-standard-for-acceptable-op-eds.php

Online Fishrrman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35,707
  • Gender: Male
  • Dumbest member of the forum
Re: The New York Times’ new standard for acceptable op-eds
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2020, 10:44:00 pm »
"The New York Times’ new standard for acceptable op-eds"

The standard:
"Conservative minds need not apply..."

Welcome to the news gulag...