Sullivan may not have broken laws with his actions, but this judge clearly is violating his oath to administer impartial justice. That much was established by his unprecedented action when he brought in a former justice to essentially act as an adjudicating prosecutor after the fact.
Many legal scholars have weighed in on this issue and have said Sullivan‘s behavior strains the definition of legal ethics, traditions and practices, fairness and impartiality.
He must, at minimum, be removed from the Flynn case.