Author Topic: Judge declares ‘constitutional rights not absolute’ in upholding Michigan stay-home order  (Read 421 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Elderberry

  • TBR Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 24,625
American Military News by  Laura Widener  April 30, 2020

Judge declares ‘constitutional rights not absolute’ in upholding Michigan stay-home order

A Michigan judge has refused to block Gov. Whitmer’s stay-home order, which he deemed as “necessary” and constitutional despite admitting its infringement on constitutional rights.

Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray ruled on Wednesday against a lawsuit brought by five Michigan residents who argued that the order was abusive and a violation of rights of due process. “Most, if not all, individual constitutional rights are not absolute and are subject to a balancing with the countervailing state interest,” Murray declared in justifying the order.

“It is true that this measure is a severe one, and greatly restricts each of our liberties to move about as we see fit, as we do in normal times,” Murray admitted. “But the governor determined that severe measures were necessary, and had to be quickly implemented to prevent the uncontrolled spreading of the virus.”

Murray justified the infringement of rights by describing the order as temporary and in the public’s interest.

“Those liberty interests are, and always have been, subject to society’s interest —society being our fellow residents. They — our fellow residents — have an interest to remain unharmed by a highly communicable and deadly virus,” Murray wrote.

More: https://americanmilitarynews.com/2020/04/judge-declares-constitutional-rights-not-absolute-in-upholding-michigan-stay-home-order/

Offline jmyrlefuller

  • J. Myrle Fuller
  • Cat Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 22,409
  • Gender: Male
  • Realistic nihilist
    • Fullervision
And thus, the Empire of Michigan is born.
New profile picture in honor of Public Domain Day 2024