Author Topic: If every citizen had N95 Masks, Would Government Be Justified in Locking Down The Population Next T  (Read 152 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rangerrebew

  • Guest

Constitutional Law, Courts, Politics, Society   April 5, 2020   
If every citizen had N95 Masks, Would Government Be Justified in Locking Down The Population Next Time?

By Darren Smith, Weekend contributor

I have to wonder if our state government’s lockdown of the population, curtailment of civil liberties, destruction of job opportunities, and denial of basic medical, education, and cultural needs would have been necessary and legally justified had each of us been equipped with our own supply of masks.

At the beginning of the self-declared State of Emergency, Washington Governor Jay Inslee declared, among many other restrictions, that access to basic medical services, such as routine doctor visits, dental procedures, diagnostic services were to be prohibited, ostensibly on the fact that masks should be diverted from these services and conserved to supply hospitals and critical care centers that were lacking in preparedness and woefully out of stock. He further reiterated that because the public will spread corona virus, we were ordered to self-quaranteen, resulting in tens of thousands of job losses, an upset in daily life and the general loss of liberty.

https://jonathanturley.org/2020/04/05/if-every-citizen-had-n95-masks-would-government-be-justified-in-locking-down-the-population-next-time/

Offline goatprairie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8,970
I know this is a minor point, and I agree with most of what is stated in the article, but the writer misspells  quarantine and accommodate..."quaranteen" and "accomodate."
Grammar and spelling mistakes by people getting paid for what they write irks the heck out of me.  9999hair out0000
Wouldn't you think someone writing for money would proofread what they write?