Communism 101: Democrats in Ohio, California and Oregon Push Laws Demanding That Private Property Ow

[rangerrebew]

Communism 101: Democrats in Ohio, California and Oregon Push Laws Demanding That Private Property Owners Allow Homeless to Camp on Their Land
Jim Hoft by Jim Hoft March 1, 2020 1262 Comments
 

A very disturbing video was posted on Twitter this weekend.
A homeowner in Los Angeles claims the local government is preventing him from removing a homeless encampment from his property.
 
According to local Democrats there is no such thing as private property.
Via Michael Coudrey.

    EXPLICIT WARNING ⚠️:

    Look at the homeless epidemic in Los Angeles due to failed liberal policies, high taxes, and high crime.

    Police are now demanding citizens allow homeless people to camp on their private property, threatening this man with arrest if he moves them. pic.twitter.com/2uBHBCZVuj

    — Michael Coudrey (@MichaelCoudrey) March 1, 2020

The validity of this video was not confirmed.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/communism-101-democrats-in-ohio-california-and-portland-push-laws-that-demand-private-property-owners-allow-homeless-to-camp-on-their-land/

[sneakypete]

Does that law also ban gates with electronic locks that have to be opened to enter exclusive neighborhoods,and ban armed guards at other gates?

What about doormen or locked/electronic key doors at exclusive condo's in cities?

Enquiring minds,and all dat.

[skeeter]

I cannot imagine the level of rage this guy must be feeling right now.

[sneakypete]

I saw a video from somewhere in Virginia a couple of days ago that actually had a case of a homeless man had somehow built a small house (maybe 200 sq ft)on the rear of someone's property and even had electricity there. A neighbor was being interviewed who wanted to know how he got a power meter on property he didn't own,but there it was on display by the camera. They also featured the homeless guy (who looked to be in his 60's) walking home carrying his little dog and refusing to answer any questions.

I have to admit from what I could see of the little place,it was well-built,but still,who wants homeless people building houses on property they own?

[sneakypete]

Has it ever occurred to anyone that the wealthy left is pushing this not for "equality" or "save de po" reasons,but to drive people out of desirable areas to live so the land prices will drop and they can buy it all up to prevent the "undesirables" from moving back in?

After all,why build a multi-million dollar mansion on a 1 acre lot if you can have 100 acres or even more for pocket change at tax sales?