I can easily name some who have never had a good word to say about Trump, but that's not quite what I was driving at. I'm not sure what I was after, anyway. This is a long, long thread that has gone into so many different directions.
I don't think people are dismissing the moral nature of the President, it just doesn't always factor heavily enough to have them decide they can't vote for him. What does matter is we'd be in big trouble if the country elects someone who threatens the gains that have been made by an imperfect man.
It doesn't really matter if there are a few you can name who have never said anything nice about Trump. You are talking with me, and I happen to agree with some of the things he's done (as I knew I would, and said so even before the election).
My point in saying what I did was that you seem to be dismissing the argument itself as "pointless" because of some you can mention, when the people who are actually discussing this with are not in that category.
IOW, you are dismissing the argument I am making because of somebody else.
My point continues to be, if the President is lacking integrity, though he may do things we as moral people agree with (I presume morality among the members of this forum, Trump voters or not), it is still important to keep the issue of his lack of integrity front and center.
Because people who lack integrity cannot be relied on to continue on any given path, even one we may agree with, when it no longer brings him the acclaim (or votes?) he seeks.
The man is self-centered and dishonest. That matters. I happen to be one of the apparent dinosaurs who continues to put who a person IS above what he or she DOES. Because who they are inside is eternal, and what they happen to do, for whatever self-absorbed reason they happen to do it, is at best transient.
So even if one says BRAVO for the revenge, the future doesn't bode well for those who are seeking vengeance and not righteousness.