Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
22m
7. There’s no preponderance of evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt standard. And THIS trial is to be based on the information gathered by the House Democrats and used to cast votes in the House.This isn’t a prospective process. We all know what’s happening here. It’s a sham.
Show this thread
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
22m
6.This is all idiotic. For those former federal prosecutors who keep saying you can’t have a trial without witnesses, this isn’t a courtroom. The rules of evidence don’t apply. The jury is not selected through some objective
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
22m
5. Plus, they get witnesses they passed over in the House? The Democrats continue pushing the Stalinist system, and Romney, Collins, et al, are apparently all for it. They’re being played for fools.
Show this thread
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
22m
4. Furthermore, the Democrats don’t want to hear from all witnesses. They want to pick the witnesses and none others. This is exactly what they did in the House. Is that how a “trial†works? Prosecutors get to determine all trial witnesses?
Show this thread
Mark R. Levin
@marklevinshow
·
22m
3. And if they’re defeated in November, it’ll be due, in significant part, to their own political miscalculations today. I would ask them, however, to list the other witnesses they wish to hear. So far, they’ve not. We’d like to know.
