Well, I guess what I am concerned about is things like partial/inaccurate findings on fossil fuels and/or green energy which could make the conversation more difficult than it is now.
Could be vaccines, climate, etc..... more ammunition for the lefties.
If they are willing to impeach a president over nothing imagine what they would do with this..
When preliminary indications from some study are being released without any qualification other than that they are preliminary results of an investigation, you don't have any evidence, just a premature conclusion.
If the study is open to review, then you can at least see if the researchers are asking the right questions and if their results will be inconclusive or definitive.
Abstracts are like headlines, and I have read studies where the research didn't support either the Abstract nor the Conclusions, often based on little more than a literature review heavily quoting other studies which, in turn, did not adequately support their conclusions.
Turning a critical eye toward research allegedly supporting gun control, motorcycle helmet laws, and many other topics will reveal a lot
IF you can read the study and the ones which it quotes as references.
So either open it up, or don't release results of incomplete research, but completed research should be a full disclosure thing, so results can be repeated to test the conclusions.