Gregg Jarrett: Trump impeachment based on unreliable presumptions, rumor and innuendo – Not facts
By Gregg Jarrett | Fox News
The House Intelligence Committee’s impeachment hearing Wednesday posed a conundrum. Better yet, let’s call it a riddle. When is a “quid pro quo†not a “quid pro quo?†The answer is … when it’s “presumed.â€
U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testified that there was a “quid pro quo†between the U.S. and Ukraine, even though President Trump made it crystal clear to Sondland that there was no “quid pro quo.â€
So, how did the ambassador arrive at his opinion that a “quid pro quo†must somehow exist? It turns out that he assumed or “presumed†it. At one point, he called it a mere “guess.â€
more
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-trump-impeachment-based-on-unreliable-presumptions-rumor-and-innuendo-not-facts